[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] compiling kni module on Ubunutu 12.04 failed

> On Ubuntu 12.04.4 file '/proc/version_signature' contains > 'Ubuntu 3.11.0-15.25~precise1-generic 3.11.10'. This introduce compilation > error since '~precise1' will not be discarded. This patch discards > everything after '~' inclusively. > > Signed-off-by: Pawel Wodkowski Acked-by: Thomas M

[dpdk-dev] DPDK supported processor

It works fine with DPDK at least. The problem is that OVDK, especially ovs-dpdk command supported by the OVDK, doesn't work correctly. I tested the DPDK application, l3fwd, in order to know where the incorrect operation comes from, either DPDK or OVDK itself. And I know now the issue seems belongi

[dpdk-dev] DPDK supported processor

I have SUPERMICRO A1SRi-2758F mainboard (onboard Atom C2758), and onboard NICs work fine with DPDK application. 2014-08-21 18:17 GMT+09:00 BYEONG-GI KIM : > Well, I did think that the NIC in my testing machine may not support DPDK > rather than thinking l3fwd is not working. > > I just tested the

[dpdk-dev] DPDK supported processor

Well, I did think that the NIC in my testing machine may not support DPDK rather than thinking l3fwd is not working. I just tested the l3fwd sample application to identify whether the NIC supports DPDK or not. Best regards Byeong-Gi KIM 2014-08-21 18:14 GMT+09:00 Chae-yong Chong : > Hi > > Co

[dpdk-dev] DPDK supported processor

Hello. Hmm, the problem is a little complicated. Actually, I'm trying to use dpdk-ovs with openstack deployment, but it seems not working correctly. I've thus been trying to keep track of the primary problem of this. I've thought my machine's hardware requirements may not be satisfied to support

[dpdk-dev] DPDK supported processor

Hi, What is the problem in l3fwd? link speed? 2014-08-21 18:00 GMT+09:00 BYEONG-GI KIM : > Thank you for the reply. > > I tested l3forwarding sample application, and the results were as below: > > sudo ./build/l3fwd -c 0x0F -n 4 -- -p 0x03 > --config="(0,0,0),(0,1,1),(1,0,2),(1,1,3)" > EAL: Det

[dpdk-dev] DPDK supported processor

Thank you for the reply. I tested l3forwarding sample application, and the results were as below: sudo ./build/l3fwd -c 0x0F -n 4 -- -p 0x03 --config="(0,0,0),(0,1,1),(1,0,2),(1,1,3)" EAL: Detected lcore 0 as core 0 on socket 0 EAL: Detected lcore 1 as core 1 on socket 0 EAL: Detected lcore 2 as

[dpdk-dev] ixgbe network card has dev_info.max_rx_queues == 0

Hi. I have face a strange error on one of my network cards. Call to rte_eth_dev_configure returns with error code -22. Increaing the verbosity level shows the following: PMD: rte_eth_dev_configure: ethdev port_id=2 nb_rx_queues=3 > 0 EAL: Error - exiting with code: 1 here is the snippet of code

[dpdk-dev] [PATCHv3] librte_acl make it build/work for 'default' target

Make ACL library to build/work on 'default' architecture: - make rte_acl_classify_scalar really scalar (make sure it wouldn't use sse4 instrincts through resolve_priority()). - Provide two versions of rte_acl_classify code path: rte_acl_classify_sse() - could be build and used only on systems wi

[dpdk-dev] ixgbe network card has dev_info.max_rx_queues == 0

RX and TX Are short hand for Receive and Transmit Queues. These Queues Store the in/egress packets. Just looking at the info you've sent it tells you that max_rx_queues for this dev is 0 (Clearly something is wrong here) so the nb_rx_q which is 3 is an Invalid Value -EINVAL == -22. On Thu, Aug 21

[dpdk-dev] DPDK supported processor

Hello. I'm now using Intel Atom processor C2758 on the DPDK testing machines, but it seems not working. Which sample application would be recommended to test the NIC actually works well with DPDK? Best regards Byeong-Gi KIM

[dpdk-dev] DPDK supported processor

> > From: BYEONG-GI KIM [mailto:kimbyeonggi at gmail.com] > Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2014 11:09 AM > To: Masaru Oki; De Lara Guarch, Pablo; dev at dpdk.org > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] DPDK supported processor > > It works fine with DPDK at least. > > The problem is that OVDK, especially ovs-dpd

[dpdk-dev] About RTE_MAX_ETHPORT_QUEUE_STATS_MAPS

Hi, Documentation and header files describe stat_idx parameter for rte_eth_dev_set_tx_queue_stats_mapping and rte_eth_dev_set_rx_queue_stats_mapping as The value must be in the range [0, RTE_MAX_ETHPORT_QUEUE_STATS_MAPS - 1] I have not found a definition for RTE_MAX_ETHPORT_QUEUE_STATS_MAPS

[dpdk-dev] DPDK supported processor

Hi, > -Original Message- > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of BYEONG-GI KIM > Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2014 10:18 AM > To: Chae-yong Chong; dev at dpdk.org > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] DPDK supported processor > > Well, I did think that the NIC in my testing machine ma

[dpdk-dev] DPDK supported processor

> -Original Message- > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of BYEONG-GI KIM > Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2014 7:04 AM > To: dev at dpdk.org > Subject: [dpdk-dev] DPDK supported processor > > Hello. > > I'm now using Intel Atom processor C2758 on the DPDK testing machines,

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] examples/vhost: Support jumbo frame in user space vhost

Hi all, Any comments for this patch? And what's the status for merging it into mainline? Thanks in advance Changchun > -Original Message- > From: Ouyang, Changchun > Sent: Friday, August 15, 2014 12:58 PM > To: dev at dpdk.org > Cc: Cao, Waterman; Ouyang, Changchun > Subject: [PATCH] exa

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] virtio: Support mergeable buffer in virtio pmd

Hi all, Any comments for this patch? And what's the status for merging it into mainline? Thanks in advance Changchun > -Original Message- > From: Ouyang, Changchun > Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2014 4:55 PM > To: dev at dpdk.org > Cc: Cao, Waterman; Ouyang, Changchun > Subject: [PATCH v3]