On 09/27/2013 05:07 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> The PCI address was stored in unused variables of the netdev.
> It has been introduced in commit 75ab826258c1099e2e56ec48fd17dfa559cd.
> But it is a useless hack.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Monjalon
> ---
> kmod/vmxnet3_drv.c | 12
The PCI address was stored in unused variables of the netdev.
It has been introduced in commit 75ab826258c1099e2e56ec48fd17dfa559cd.
But it is a useless hack.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Monjalon
---
kmod/vmxnet3_drv.c | 12
1 file changed, 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kmod/vmxnet3
Qinglai,
Looks good. I will try it out tonight.
Thanks ...
-Venky
-Original Message-
From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Qinglai Xiao
Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2013 6:35 AM
To: dev at dpdk.org
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] Add support for Tx->Rx loopback mode for 82
27/09/2013 11:22, Lynch, Michael A :
> Intel has now posted Intel DPDK R1.5.0 to our site, so it can be picked up
> by dpdk.org. See: www.intel/com/go/dpdk
Thanks for these new features.
It takes time to analyze for git formatting into commits.
Merge with community enhancements is in progress.
It
Acked-by: Ivan Boule
On 09/26/2013 03:34 PM, Qinglai Xiao wrote:
> 82599 has two loopback operation modes, Tx->Rx and Rx->Tx.
> For the time being only Tx->Rx is supported.
>
> The new field lpbk_mode added in struct rte_eth_conf defines loopback
> operation mode for certain ethernet controll
What are plans to merge in latest Intel 1.5.0 DPDK?
Hi Jim, all,
Intel has now posted Intel DPDK R1.5.0 to our site, so it can be picked up by
dpdk.org. See: www.intel/com/go/dpdk
You'll find the code and supporting documentation in the "Content by Topic"
section, under "Intel DPDK Software and Documentation"
Regards,
Mike
-Original Messag
7 matches
Mail list logo