ported NIC, however 82598 is a supported NIC and it seems that
>> dpdk did bind to the Intel NIC. However, rte_eth_dev_count() somehow still
>> returns 0. Any help would be great! Thanks!
>>
>> Peter
>>
>
>
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/attachments/20130614/0abed171/attachment.html>
part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: DPDK_L3fwd.png
Type: image/png
Size: 23201 bytes
Desc: DPDK_L3fwd.png
URL:
<http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/attachments/20130614/5d33b5a5/attachment.png>
On Thu, 13 Jun 2013 22:14:35 -0700
Patrick Mahan wrote:
> All,
>
> I am seeing the following issue with the link_status example. This requires a
> reboot on my testbox.
>
> Ideas or suggestions?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Patrick
>
> From /var/log/messages:
This is an example of why I posted the RFC
Wow, thanks very much for that. I guess I missed that in the
documentation. I'll fix that up first thing in the morning.
Patrick
On 6/13/13 10:17 PM, Jia.Sui(??) wrote:
> Hi Patrick
>
> for l3fwd you need also set the destination mac address to the receive port
> mac address on DUT(which run
4 matches
Mail list logo