[dpdk-dev] [dpdk-announce] Wind River Releases Pktgen on GitHub

2013-05-31 Thread Wiles, Roger Keith
Wind River Systems -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/attachments/20130531/2a78d0c3/attachment.html>

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/7] Vyatta patches

2013-05-31 Thread Damien Millescamps
On 05/31/2013 05:45 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > This was confirmed by several kernel developers including Andi Kleen from > Intel. The value in /proc/cpuinfo comes from the APCI tables and is the value > reported by the BIOS. There are machines that report socket 1 and 2. > Haven't played with o

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/7] Vyatta patches

2013-05-31 Thread Damien Millescamps
On 05/30/2013 07:12 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > One fix not included is the NUMA cpu assignment. The original Intel code > in 1.2 incorrectly used /proc/cpuinfo to try and assign CPU's to NUMA socket. > The problem is that /proc/cpuinfo physical_id corresponds to what the BIOS > tells the kernel

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/7] Vyatta patches

2013-05-31 Thread Stephen Hemminger
On Fri, 31 May 2013 18:44:03 +0200 Damien Millescamps wrote: > On 05/31/2013 05:45 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > > This was confirmed by several kernel developers including Andi Kleen from > > Intel. The value in /proc/cpuinfo comes from the APCI tables and is the > > value > > reported by the

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/7] Vyatta patches

2013-05-31 Thread Stephen Hemminger
On Fri, 31 May 2013 11:29:09 +0200 Damien Millescamps wrote: > On 05/30/2013 07:12 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > > One fix not included is the NUMA cpu assignment. The original Intel code > > in 1.2 incorrectly used /proc/cpuinfo to try and assign CPU's to NUMA > > socket. > > The problem is th

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/7] Vyatta patches

2013-05-31 Thread Thomas Monjalon
Hello, 30/05/2013 10:12, Stephen Hemminger : > This is a subset of the Vyatta patches we use. They include some bug > fixes and simple changes to make life easier. Thank you > One fix not included is the NUMA cpu assignment. The original Intel code > in 1.2 incorrectly used /proc/cpuinfo to try

[dpdk-dev] What's about "sfp module setup not complete"

2013-05-31 Thread lxu
http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/attachments/20130531/2b84c225/attachment.html>

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/3] make help

2013-05-31 Thread Thomas Monjalon
30/05/2013 16:55, Olivier MATZ : > On 05/29/2013 12:15 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > Let's add help for building DPDK. > > > > changes since v1: (Olivier's review) > > - reword/reorganize help > > - reuse "showconfigs" in "config" > > - no magic sed to call "make showconfigs" in help > > Looks g