Hello Patrick,
> sudo build/app/testpmd -b :03:00.0 -b :03:00.1 -c -n3
> -- --nb-cores= --nb-ports=2 --rxd=2048 --rxd=2048 --mbcache=512
> --burst=512 --rxd= --txq=
I guess it's a typo, but just in case, I think you mean "rxq" instead
of "rxd" at the end of the command line?
You can chec
Adding other questions about packet generator:
24/05/2013 16:41, Thomas Monjalon :
> 24/05/2013 16:11, Patrick Mahan :
> > Intel Xeon E5-2690 (8 physical, 16 virtual)
>
> How many CPU sockets have you ?
>
> > 64 Gbyte DDR3 memory
> > Intel 82599EB-SPF dual port 10GE interface
> > CentOS 6.4 (2.6
Hello,
24/05/2013 16:11, Patrick Mahan :
> Intel Xeon E5-2690 (8 physical, 16 virtual)
How many CPU sockets have you ?
> 64 Gbyte DDR3 memory
> Intel 82599EB-SPF dual port 10GE interface
> CentOS 6.4 (2.6.32-358.6.1.el6.x86_64)
> The 82599 is in a 16x PCI-e slot.
Check the datasheet of your mot
Yes it is a typo. I'm away from the box and was referring to my notes.
Thanks,
Patrick
Sent from my iPad
On May 24, 2013, at 1:03 PM, Olivier MATZ wrote:
> Hello Patrick,
>
>> sudo build/app/testpmd -b :03:00.0 -b :03:00.1 -c -n3
>> -- --nb-cores= --nb-ports=2 --rxd=2048 --rxd=2048
On May 24, 2013, at 8:45 AM, Thomas Monjalon
wrote:
> Adding other questions about packet generator:
>
> 24/05/2013 16:41, Thomas Monjalon :
>> 24/05/2013 16:11, Patrick Mahan :
>>> Intel Xeon E5-2690 (8 physical, 16 virtual)
>>
>> How many CPU sockets have you ?
>>
>>> 64 Gbyte DDR3 memory
ect your test.
Okay, I noticed that they scanned by the pci dpdk layer.
Thanks,
Patrick
>
> --
> Thomas
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/attachments/20130524/47510a8c/attachment.html>
Good morning,
I have been playing with this code now for about 2 weeks. I posted
earlier about being unable to get it to work on Fedora 14, but have
it working on CentOS 6.4. Here is my hardware -
Intel Xeon E5-2690 (8 physical, 16 virtual)
64 Gbyte DDR3 memory
Intel 82599EB-SPF dual port 10GE
23/05/2013 23:41, Antti Kantee :
> On 23.05.2013 21:52, Vincent JARDIN wrote:
> > Would you like to get it mainstream into the DPDK?
>
> I think currently integration makes sense only as some sort of a
> "reachover", i.e. source is not imported into the DPDK tree, but rather
> fetched on demand.
8 matches
Mail list logo