17/05/2013 11:06, Olivier MATZ :
> On 05/07/2013 05:17 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > The macro maketxt allow to interpret syntax "# make foo" while keeping
> > indentation of the source document.
> > Here, it is used to call "make showconfigs" to list available targets.
> [..]
> > +define maketxt
17/05/2013 11:06, Olivier MATZ :
> On 05/07/2013 05:17 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > +Build options
> > + T target template (install default: *) - used with config or install
> > + O output directory (default: build/) - cannot be used with install
> > + V verbose
> > + D debug de
Hi Thomas,
> This patch introduce RTE_VER_PATCH_RELEASE so #ifdef RTE_VER_PATCH_RELEASE is
> always true. I don't see why a commercial version of the DPDK would like to
> apply part of this patch.
ok this was just a comment in case of.
17/05/2013 11:05, Olivier MATZ :
> I wonder if this new rule is really needed: I think you can already
> do a "make config" without argument to list the supported
> configurations.
Yes it is needed because "make config" adds an error comment.
But I could refactor this patch to use "make showconfig
17/05/2013 11:12, Olivier MATZ :
> > @@ -75,7 +87,8 @@ rte_version(void) {
> >
> > return RTE_VER_PREFIX" "
> >
> > RTE_STR(RTE_VER_MAJOR)"."
> > RTE_STR(RTE_VER_MINOR)"."
> >
> > - RTE_STR(RTE_VER_PATCH_LEVEL);
> > +
Hello,
17/05/2013 16:06, Patrick Mahan :
> I don't know (yet) why Fedora 14 would not
> work while CentOS does when it looks like they have the same fixes.
It's strange. I've already seen DPDK running on Fedora 14.
> The only error I was the inability to mmap the HPET even though the kernel
> co
Hi Thomas,
> @@ -75,7 +87,8 @@ rte_version(void) {
> return RTE_VER_PREFIX" "
> RTE_STR(RTE_VER_MAJOR)"."
> RTE_STR(RTE_VER_MINOR)"."
> - RTE_STR(RTE_VER_PATCH_LEVEL);
> + RTE_STR(RTE_VER_PATCH_LEVEL)"r"
> +
Thomas,
I think the "maketxt" macro is overkill... why not just a "cat" ?
Olivier
On 05/07/2013 05:17 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> The goal of this rule is to show which rules/options are available from a
> "make" command.
> Let's start by printing short doc about SDK building.
>
> The macro ma
Hi Thomas,
Good to see a "make help" ;)
What do you think of replacing "Build options" by "Build variables" ?
I think it is not obvious that we have to use V=1 for instance for
a verbose build.
About the "build targets", I suggest to include it in the help of T
variable. What do you think ?
Oli
Hi Thomas,
I wonder if this new rule is really needed: I think you can already
do a "make config" without argument to list the supported
configurations.
Olivier
On 05/07/2013 05:17 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> Allow to list configs in config/ directory with a simple make rule.
>
> Signed-off-by
This is an update to my last email requesting help with the DPDK sources and
Fedora 14.
After talking with a colleague who was investigating DPDK as well, I removed the
Fedora 14 install and installed instead CentOS 6.4. After installing the
release, I did a 'yum update' on the kernel sources to
11 matches
Mail list logo
