The Jira ticket is INFRA-26185
On 2024/10/01 19:02:46 Lee Rhodes wrote:
> This vote is now closed with 3 (+1) binding votes.
>
> On Thu, Sep 26, 2024 at 10:04 AM Alexander Saydakov
> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > I don't mind this way.
> > Later we can even have a branch from that "master" called ja
This vote is now closed with 3 (+1) binding votes.
On Thu, Sep 26, 2024 at 10:04 AM Alexander Saydakov
wrote:
> +1
>
> I don't mind this way.
> Later we can even have a branch from that "master" called java_8_11 or
> something, and delete the "master" branch to avoid confusion.
>
> On Wed, Sep 2
+1
I don't mind this way.
Later we can even have a branch from that "master" called java_8_11 or
something, and delete the "master" branch to avoid confusion.
On Wed, Sep 25, 2024 at 8:53 PM Jon Malkin wrote:
> I'm in favor of the name change for the default branch anyway, so this
> seems like
I'm in favor of the name change for the default branch anyway, so this
seems like a great time.
+1
jon
On Wed, Sep 25, 2024, 2:01 PM Lee Rhodes wrote:
> Oops, modify the close date to Monday, Sep 30th, 1:03 PM Pacific
>
> On Wed, Sep 25, 2024 at 1:03 PM Lee Rhodes wrote:
>
>> I need some PM
Oops, modify the close date to Monday, Sep 30th, 1:03 PM Pacific
On Wed, Sep 25, 2024 at 1:03 PM Lee Rhodes wrote:
> I need some PMC approvals on this issue.
>
> The code changes required to move the ds-memory code base (java 8 and 11)
> to Java 17 required a major rewrite of the code. So much
I need some PMC approvals on this issue.
The code changes required to move the ds-memory code base (java 8 and 11)
to Java 17 required a major rewrite of the code. So much so that a merge
back to the master branch would be massive, with lots of conflicts. Since
we have decided that there will be
