[VOTE RESULT]
This vote is now closed successfully with 4 (+1 binding) votes and no other
votes.
I want to thank Charlie and Justin for their help in voting on this issue.
Your participation is very much appreciated!
Lee.
On Fri, Dec 20, 2024 at 8:36 AM Justin Thaler
wrote:
> +1 from me
>
> On
+1 from me
On Fri, Dec 20, 2024 at 3:52 AM Charlie wrote:
> +1
> Happy with this.
>
> On Fri, 20 Dec 2024 at 04:56, Alexander Saydakov
> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> We have done the same for datasketches-memory repo and for the same
>> reason. Makes sense to me.
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 19, 2024 at 6:08 PM J
+1
Happy with this.
On Fri, 20 Dec 2024 at 04:56, Alexander Saydakov
wrote:
> +1
>
> We have done the same for datasketches-memory repo and for the same
> reason. Makes sense to me.
>
> On Thu, Dec 19, 2024 at 6:08 PM Jon Malkin wrote:
>
>> Going to reply to this since the title change with the
+1
We have done the same for datasketches-memory repo and for the same reason.
Makes sense to me.
On Thu, Dec 19, 2024 at 6:08 PM Jon Malkin wrote:
> Going to reply to this since the title change with the corrected date
> broke threading.
>
> +1 from me (binding)
>
> I generally favor the remai
Going to reply to this since the title change with the corrected date broke
threading.
+1 from me (binding)
I generally favor the remaining anyway, and this is a good excuse to do it.
Plus the reason described seems valid to me.
jon
On Thu, Dec 19, 2024, 3:41 PM Lee Rhodes wrote:
> I need s
Change the vote close no earlier than date to:
This vote will close no earlier than Tuesday, Dec 24, 2024, 3:45 PM PST.
I need some PMC approvals on this issue.
The code changes required to move the ds-java code base (java 8 and 11)
to Java 17 required a major rewrite of the code. So much so that a merge
back to the master branch would be massive, with lots of conflicts. Since
we have decided that there will be no
