[VOTE RESULT]
This vote is now closed as PASSED with 3 (+1 binding) votes, one (+1)
non-binding vote and no other votes.
On Fri, Oct 11, 2024 at 10:13 AM Lee Rhodes wrote:
> +1 (binding)
> Checked
> - mvn clean test for both java8 and 11
> - NOTICE and LICENSE are OK
> - checksums and signature
+1 (binding)
Checked
- mvn clean test for both java8 and 11
- NOTICE and LICENSE are OK
- checksums and signatures OK
On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 8:56 AM Jon Malkin wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Checked:
> * signatures and checksums for all release files
> * NOTICE and LICENSE seem unchanged from befor
+1 (binding)
Checked:
* signatures and checksums for all release files
* NOTICE and LICENSE seem unchanged from before
* mvn clean test with both java8 and java11 pass
I do wish we'd been more explicit about compatible java versions in the
readme, especially since the error message when trying to
+1
- NOTICE and LICENSE look fine
- checked GPG and SHA
- "mvn test" passes (java 8 and 11)
On Tue, Oct 8, 2024 at 5:52 AM Yang Jie wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Tested 6.1.1-RC1 with the master of Apache Spark, and all relevant test
> cases have passed.
>
> Thanks Lee Rhodes ~
>
> Jie Yang
>
