+1 (binding)
- Checked signatures of the core release zip and maven subdir
- LICENSE and NOTICE look good
- tested on my linux box:
- java 8: mvn clean test -- ok
- java 11: mvn clean test -- ok
- java 17: mvn test -- invalid version (no clean)
- java 21: mvn test -- invalid version (no cl
+1
- checked gpg and shasum
- LICANSE and NOTICE look fine
- "mvn test" passes (openjdk 11)
On Tue, Oct 1, 2024 at 9:02 AM Yang Jie wrote:
> +1, this version is still fine for me, Thanks Lee Rhodes ~
>
> Jie Yang
>
> On 2024/10/01 01:27:25 Lee Rhodes wrote:
> > *Key Changes From Last Release*
>
This vote is now closed with 3 (+1) binding votes.
On Thu, Sep 26, 2024 at 10:04 AM Alexander Saydakov
wrote:
> +1
>
> I don't mind this way.
> Later we can even have a branch from that "master" called java_8_11 or
> something, and delete the "master" branch to avoid confusion.
>
> On Wed, Sep 2
+1, this version is still fine for me, Thanks Lee Rhodes ~
Jie Yang
On 2024/10/01 01:27:25 Lee Rhodes wrote:
> *Key Changes From Last Release*
> ### Removed a Java version check that prevented running with Java 21 in
> limited mode. Java 21 is not supported, but if the user is not using
> off-he
