Re: DataFusion Logical Types and Typed expressions

Technically, all GiotHub issue/PR discussions are on the mailing list because they get replicated to the git...@datafusion.apache.org mailing list, but it is definitely good to send emails to dev@ as well for issues like this that could affect downstream us

Re: DataFusion Logical Types and Typed expressions

OT: this email address is being archived next year. This is my active address reserved for OSS contributions: g...@filippo.dev (which I'm adding as one of the receivers) Thanks, Filippo On September 24, 2024, Piotr Findeisen wrote: > Hi > > I am aware this message may seem redundant, given most

Re: DataFusion Logical Types and Typed expressions

Hi all, > We hope this will go as far as removing arrow physical types completely > from planning process, i.e. even physical plans will use the logical types. > > BTW I want the logical types to be "the types", and be the only thing > function implementors need to be worried about. This is pret

Re: DataFusion Logical Types and Typed expressions

I will review this again more carefully today. I am sorry I have not been more responsive -- It is / has been a very busy week for me On Tue, Sep 24, 2024 at 7:06 AM Piotr Findeisen wrote: > Hi > > I am aware this message may seem redundant, given most communication > happens in GitHub issues wi