Re: [VOTE] Release Apache DataFusion Comet 0.3.0 RC1

Thanks for letting me know. Something seems to have changed with my local gpg installation and the signing had failed. I had to add "--pinentry-mode loopback”. I will create a PR tomorrow to update the script. The file is there now. > On Sep 24, 2024, at 8:57 PM, L. C. Hsieh wrote: > >> [2]

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache DataFusion Comet 0.3.0 RC1

> [2]: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/datafusion/apache-datafusion-comet-0.3.0-rc1 Is this link correct? I got a error of ``` Not Found The requested URL was not found on this server. ``` On Tue, Sep 24, 2024 at 6:16 PM Andy Grove wrote: > > Hi, > > I would like to propose a release

[VOTE] Release Apache DataFusion Comet 0.3.0 RC1

Hi, I would like to propose a release of Apache DataFusion Comet version 0.3.0. ** NOTE: we now have JAR files available for download for testing the release candidate. See notes below. ** This release candidate is based on commit: 3783faaa01078a35bee93b299368f8c72869198d [1] The proposed rele

Re: [DISCUSS] Enable GitHub Discussions for DataFusion Comet

+1 on github discussions. Keeping in mind the following adage, I would also suggest that *decisions* should be reposted on the mailing list - " If it didn’t happen on a mailing list, it didn’t happen." [1] [1] https://incubator.apache.org/guides/committer.html#mailing_lists On Mon, Sep 23, 202

Re: DataFusion Logical Types and Typed expressions

Technically, all GiotHub issue/PR discussions are on the mailing list because they get replicated to the git...@datafusion.apache.org mailing list, but it is definitely good to send emails to dev@ as well for issues like this that could affect downstream us

Re: DataFusion Logical Types and Typed expressions

OT: this email address is being archived next year. This is my active address reserved for OSS contributions: g...@filippo.dev (which I'm adding as one of the receivers) Thanks, Filippo On September 24, 2024, Piotr Findeisen wrote: > Hi > > I am aware this message may seem redundant, given most

Re: DataFusion Logical Types and Typed expressions

Hi all, > We hope this will go as far as removing arrow physical types completely > from planning process, i.e. even physical plans will use the logical types. > > BTW I want the logical types to be "the types", and be the only thing > function implementors need to be worried about. This is pret

Re: DataFusion Logical Types and Typed expressions

I will review this again more carefully today. I am sorry I have not been more responsive -- It is / has been a very busy week for me On Tue, Sep 24, 2024 at 7:06 AM Piotr Findeisen wrote: > Hi > > I am aware this message may seem redundant, given most communication > happens in GitHub issues wi

DataFusion Logical Types and Typed expressions

Hi I am aware this message may seem redundant, given most communication happens in GitHub issues with some spill over to the ASF Slack. Posting this to make sure we follow "the apache way" (“If it didn’t happen on the mailing list, it didn’t happen.”). There is a great proposal from Filippo Rossi