JDK 1.7 and CXF

Just FYI, I did a test build using JDK 1.7 against CXF... it failed. 'just wondering if you guys are going to start test builds using JDK 1.7? -- Robert

Use of Apache Jakarta ORO

Is Apache Jakarta ORO still be used by CXF? The WHICH_JARS file state: "For Java2WSDL and WSDL2Java: ... - oro.jar ..." However, I wasn't able to find the imports for it. I ask because Apache Jakarta ORO is now retired... http://jakarta.apache.org/oro/ And it may be a good move to refactor ou

Aegis and Apache Camel

Just FYI... I opened this feature request in the Apache Camel space: "add support for Aegis as a marshalling format" https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-4330 -- Sincerely, Robert J. Liguori STG Technologies, Inc.

Aegis, XmlBeans and CXF

I'm not understanding the "home" of the Aegis databinding within CXF. Shouldn't Aegis have it's own Apache project? Similarly, what's up with Apache XmlBeans? It seems to need a place to thrive (as it's relatively inactive)... could XmlBeans be subsumed/hosted by CXF? Better yet, what abou

2.4.2 vs. 2.4.0 in all JAR filenames

Just FYI... In the 2.4.2 release, the following JAR's did not have their names updated: cxf-xjc-boolean-2.4.0.jar cxf-xjc-bug671-2.4.0.jar cxf-xjc-dv-2.4.0.jar cxf-xjc-ts-2.4.0.jar Was this intentional? -- Sincerely, Robert J. Liguori STG Technologies, Inc.

My outstanding CXF issues and their feasibility.

Hello CXF Dev Team, I've just spent some time closing out a bunch of my Apache issues that were not feasible. In regards to my CXF issues I've opened, most of them have already been fixed and implemented by the Apache Team... thanks! However I do have a few left over that I'm trying to bring

Re: My outstanding CXF issues and their feasibility.

Thanks! I've updated the necessary issues accordingly. -- Robert On Wed, 31 Aug 2011 14:55:32 -0400, Daniel Kulp wrote: > On Wednesday, August 31, 2011 1:52:21 PM Robert Liguori wrote: >> I've just spent some time closing out a bunch of my Apache issues that >> were

Aegis and Camel... is there a need for it?

As I previously mentioned, I recently opened this issue: "add support for Aegis as a marshalling format" https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-4330 Does it make sense, is there a need for it, or should I close the issue out? Note: I probably should've asked this question before I opened

Contributing was fun...

Dear CXF community... Hey, it was a lot of fun contributing! But I've deciding to spend my free time in other spaces moving forward. I may be back in the future, but in the interim, thanks for having me... c'ya. -- Robert -- Sincerely, Robert J. Liguori