Re: [VOTE] Release CXF 2.1

2008-04-24 Thread Jim Jagielski
g didn't > work yesterday when I did the build and I didn't know when > infrastructure was going to get it working. However, since I need to > rebuild, I'll go ahead and fix this as well. > -- ==

Re: [VOTE] Release CXF 2.1 (take 2)

2008-04-25 Thread Jim Jagielski
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 07:15:46PM -0400, Daniel Kulp wrote: > > This is a vote to release CXF 2.1. > Looks good: +1 -- ======= Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ &quo

Re: [VOTE] Release CXF 2.0.6

2008-04-25 Thread Jim Jagielski
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 07:20:07PM -0400, Daniel Kulp wrote: > This is a vote to release CXF 2.0.6 > +1 -- === Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ "Great is the

Re: Board report.....

2008-05-13 Thread Jim Jagielski
Looks good. On May 12, 2008, at 10:28 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote: It's board report time (after graduating, we have to file board reports for the first three months, then quarterly thereafter) Here is what I have so far: Releases: 2.1 released which is J

Re: [VOTE] Release CXF 2.0.9

2008-10-10 Thread Jim Jagielski
+1 On Oct 10, 2008, at 8:48 AM, Willem Jiang wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 This is a vote to release CXF 2.0.9 Once again, there have been a bunch of bug fixes and enhancements that have been done compared to the 2.0.9 release. Over 37 JIRA issues are resolved for 2.0

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CXF 2.1.3 (2nd try)

2008-10-20 Thread Jim Jagielski
On Oct 18, 2008, at 11:19 AM, Willem Jiang wrote: Once again, there have been a bunch of bug fixes and enhancements that have been done compared to the 2.1.2 release. Over 52 JIRA issues are resolved for 2.1.3. List of issues: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF/fixforversion/12313354