Can you provide the JVM vendor & version as well please?
Do you have a sample of your wsdl you can provide?
A ServiceConstructionException can happen at various stages as CXF
compares the provided service, port, bindings with what's been parsed
from the wsdl.
On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 8:16 AM Sho
Good morning/afternoon,
Can we update https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-9002 to resolved?
The test suite no longer fails under IBM Java.
[INFO]
[INFO] ---
[INFO] T E S T S
[INFO] ---
The in-progress cards for 4.1.0 include:
CXF-9008 FIPS Support
CXF-9005 EE10 JAX-RS TCK Test Failures
CXF-9007 NPE in XMLStreamDataWriter
CXF-8976 Update to OpenTelemetry v1.39.0
CXF-8969 Update to Brave 6
Not sure what the Committers/PMCs have planned for 4.1, my assumption
is that FIPS support
Please see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FEDIZ-257
I take from the comments on the card that the community needs to step
up and help Fediz towards CXF 4.0 / Jakarta support.
On Wed, Jun 12, 2024 at 8:12 AM Sai Charan Teja Pratti
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> We are upgrading to Tomcat 10.x. We obse
the official release will be available for
> the above jars which are jakarta ee 9 compatible from Apache cxf Fediz
>
> Thanks,
> Sai Charan Teja
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 12, 2024 at 5:18 PM Jamie G. wrote:
>>
>> Please see https://issues.a
+1 (non-binding)
Cheers,
Jamie
On Mon, Jul 15, 2024 at 5:38 AM Alessio Soldano wrote:
>
> +1
> Thanks!
>
> On Fri, Jul 12, 2024 at 10:23 PM Freeman Fang
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > It’s been a while since the last releases and many issues have been
> > addressed, so here is the VOTE for CXF 4.0.
+1, makes sense.
On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 2:16 PM, Jeff Genender wrote:
> +1… this probably needs to happen pretty soon…
>
> Jeff
>
>> On Apr 6, 2015, at 10:42 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> as you may know, codehaus will be down soon:
>>
>> http://www.codehaus.org/
>>
>> Even
+1
Cheers,
Jamie
On Wed, Nov 6, 2024 at 8:57 AM Andriy Redko wrote:
>
> +1, thanks Colm!
>
> On Wed, Nov 6, 2024, 6:18 a.m. Colm O hEigeartaigh
> wrote:
>
> > This is a vote to release Apache CXF Fediz 1.7.0. This release
> > upgrades to CXF 3.6.4, hence JDK 11, and Jakarta.
> >
> > Artifacts:
+1
Cheers,
Jamie
On Mon, Dec 2, 2024 at 12:17 AM Jim Ma wrote:
>
> +1
>
> On Sun, Dec 1, 2024 at 10:05 PM Andriy Redko wrote:
>
> > Hey folks,
> >
> > In preparation for CXF releases, this is vote to release cxf-build-utils
> > 4.0.2.
> >
> > Staging areas:
> > 4.0.2:
> > https://repository.apa
+1
Cheers,
Jamie
On Mon, Dec 2, 2024 at 12:17 AM Jim Ma wrote:
>
> +1
>
> On Sun, Dec 1, 2024 at 10:24 PM Andriy Redko wrote:
>
> > Hey folks,
> >
> > In preparation for CXF releases, this is a vote to release cxf-xjc-utils
> > 4.1.0.
> >
> > Staging areas:
> > 4.1.0:
> > https://repository.apa
+1
Verified on several JVMs, ISAs, OSes.
Lab Test Results:
https://github.com/savoirtech/apache-cxf-report/blob/main/README.md (4.0.6)
https://github.com/savoirtech/apache-cxf-report/blob/cxf-3.6.5/README.md
https://github.com/savoirtech/apache-cxf-report/blob/cxf-3.5.10/README.md
Cheers,
Jamie
+1
Multi-platform test results:
https://github.com/savoirtech/apache-cxf-report/tree/cxf-4.1.0
Cheers,
Jamie
On Tue, Dec 10, 2024 at 5:05 AM Alexey Markevich wrote:
>
> +1
>
> On Tue, Dec 10, 2024 at 8:01 AM Francesco Chicchiriccò
> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > Thanks Freeman
> > Regards.
> >
> > O
For the users, having Camel & CXF 4.x lines available makes a lot of
sense - if splitting the work out to a repo to facilitate its
maintenance then that's ok.
Will Apache Karaf by default pick up these two repos, making it
effectively seamless from the end user point of view? They'll just
install
; reading:ssl/record/rec_layer_s3.c:687:
>
> Attaching CXF call stack during failure by enabling -Djavax.net.debug=all
>
> Please help us if you can get any insights on this issue.
>
> Thanks,
> Lakshmi.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jamie G.
> Sen
In CXF 4.0.5 we updated a few test certs - this was in respect to IBM
Semeru & RedHat JDKs:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310511&version=12354390
These should not have caused any particular issues for regular
runtime. You can test with CXF 4.0.4 to rule out tho
+1
Cheers,
Jamie
On Wed, Mar 5, 2025 at 6:03 AM Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote:
>
> +1.
>
> Colm.
>
> On Tue, Mar 4, 2025 at 3:18 PM wrote:
> >
> > +1
> >
> > Jeff
> >
> > > On Mar 3, 2025, at 1:53 PM, Freeman Fang wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > It’s been a while since last releases and many is
16 matches
Mail list logo
