Re: Release cxf-xjc-plugin so that it works with Java 10?

+1 Yeah, add automatic-module-name in MANIFEST is a good start that CXF can eventually move to module-path way. Since CXF is actually already OSGi module based, we won’t run into such “split-package” issue in CXF, follow the common rule(root package name) to add automatic-module-name in each

Re: 10 years of CXF - Happy Birthday!

Wow, ten years, time flies! We should have a beer together, remotely, ;) I am so grateful and proud that I am part of this great project and looking forward another 10 years’ success of Apache CXF! Thanks to very one in this community, a lot of memorable experience. － Freeman(Yue) Fa

Re: Release cxf-xjc-plugin so that it works with Java 10?

Yep, I think we should use the common root package for each module. － Freeman(Yue) Fang Red Hat, Inc. FuseSource is now part of Red Hat > On May 23, 2018, at 6:28 PM, Dennis Kieselhorst wrote: > > Hi Andriy! > >> Haven't started work on automatic module names yet, my bad. But we

Re: Release cxf-xjc-plugin so that it works with Java 10?

. FuseSource is now part of Red Hat > On May 23, 2018, at 6:42 PM, Freeman Fang wrote: > > Yep, I think we should use the common root package for each module. > － > Freeman(Yue) Fang > > Red Hat, Inc. > FuseSource is now part of Red Hat > > > >&

Re: Release cxf-xjc-plugin so that it works with Java 10?

Hi Andriy, Thanks for your work. I just believe the most important part of the module name is the uniqueness, and the root package name can give us the uniqueness naturally, as different modules shouldn’t have same root package names. Please take a look at this blog[1] which compared two name

Re: [VOTE] CXF 3.2.5/3.1.16

+1 Thanks! － Freeman(Yue) Fang Red Hat, Inc. FuseSource is now part of Red Hat > On Jun 19, 2018, at 7:35 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote: > > This is a vote to release CXF 3.2.5 and 3.1.16. The 3.2.5 staging area also > include releases of cxf-buildutils and cxf-xjc-utils as they were

Re: Change master to 3.3?

+1 And how about for the master we also have spring 5 + spring boot 2, basically merge the spring-5-boot-2 branch? Cheers － Freeman(Yue) Fang Red Hat, Inc. FuseSource is now part of Red Hat > On Jun 26, 2018, at 10:26 PM, Andrey Redko wrote: > > Big +1, same question as Colm h

Re: swagger-jaxrs2 2.0.1 / JAXB 2.3.0

FYI, I’ve already start doing it on Servicemix side, please see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SM-3760 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SM-3759 I need more tests for OSGi systests of CXF

Re:

Hi Irfan, Could you please raise a jira ticket? I think add a Throwable catch can resolve this problem with IBM JDK. Thanks! － Freeman(Yue) Fang Red Hat, Inc. FuseSource is now part of Red Hat > On Sep 21, 2018, at 8:53 PM, Irfan Pasha wrote: > > Andrey, > > We have been usin

Re: Fixing JDK10 (and probably JDK9) builds for master

Hi Andriy, Thanks! And I don’t think we need to worry about JDK9 failure a lot since JDK9 is EOL now. Could we also setup build job for JDK11(IIRC we need EasyMock 3.7-SNAPSHOT for JDK11[1])? Since JDK11 is the LTS version I believe we should target to support this version mainly. [1]https:/

Re: (CXF-7852) - CX 3.3

t;> 11 >>>>>>> To: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>[ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>> https://issues.apache

Re: [VOTE] - Release Apache CXF 3.1.17

+1 Thanks! － Freeman(Yue) Fang Red Hat, Inc. FuseSource is now part of Red Hat > On Sep 30, 2018, at 8:33 PM, Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote: > > This is a vote to release Apache CXF 3.1.17. > > Issues fixed: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=1231051

Re: swagger-jaxrs2 2.0.1 / JAXB 2.3.0

Hi Dennis, Are you using JDK9, please use JDK11 instead, as it’s the LTS version. The OSGi tests part passed on my machine with JDK11 and latest Karaf 4.2.2-SNAPSHOT kit. I put javax.activation fix in Karaf 4.2.2-SNAPSHOT today so probably this is the reason why CI failed because the SNAPSHOT wh

Re: swagger-jaxrs2 2.0.1 / JAXB 2.3.0

ot; > > Colm. > > On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 11:31 AM Freeman Fang > wrote: > >> Hi Dennis, >> >> Are you using JDK9, please use JDK11 instead, as it’s the LTS version. >> The OSGi tests part passed on my machine with JDK11 and latest Karaf >> 4.2

Re: [VOTE] CXF 3.2.7 and xic-utils 3.2.3

+1 Thanks! － Freeman(Yue) Fang Red Hat, Inc. FuseSource is now part of Red Hat > On Oct 25, 2018, at 3:35 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote: > > It’s been over two months since we last release a 3.2.x. Thus, it’s time. > We’ve fixed a bunch of bugs, fixed some performance regressions, a

Re: swagger-jaxrs2 2.0.1 / JAXB 2.3.0

Hi Dennis, That needs Karaf 4.2.2-SNAPSHOT. I just committed to use swagger v3 2.0.5. The build should be good now. Cheers － Freeman(Yue) Fang Red Hat, Inc. > On Oct 28, 2018, at 8:12 PM, Dennis Kieselhorst wrote: > >> - @Freeman contributed the JAXB 2.3.0 specs to Apache S

Re: Adding Apache CXF to OpenJDK Quality Outreach

+1 Thanks! － Freeman(Yue) Fang Red Hat, Inc. > On Nov 1, 2018, at 7:05 PM, Andriy Redko wrote: > > Hey guys, > > I have submitted the request to add Apache CXF to OpenJDK Quality Outreach > program: https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/quality/Quality+Outreach > Basically,

Re: JDK 12 build 22 is now available at : - jdk.java.net/12/

Hi Andriy, Yup, we are so good here. Most failed tests are OSGi related, which is kinda expected, since Karaf doesn’t JDK12 yet. Time to look at Karaf with JDK12 also, I will do it soon. － Freeman(Yue) Fang Red Hat, Inc. > On Nov 30, 2018, at 8:48 PM, Andriy Redko wrote: >

Re: [cxf] branch master updated: [CXF-7934]Add cache for ProxyClassLoader

>> The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/master by this push: >>new af33b2a [CXF-7934]Add cache for ProxyClassLoader >> af33b2a is described below >> >> commit af33b2a28c39504388ea370f6849a06d551b4dd1 >> Author: Freeman Fang >>

Re: [cxf] branch master updated: [CXF-7934]Add cache for ProxyClassLoader

commit to branch master >> in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/cxf.git >> >> >> The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/master by this push: >>new af33b2a [CXF-7934]Add cache for ProxyClassLoader >> af33b2a is described below >> >

Re: New Maven coordinates for Jakarta EE specs

I will also take a look at the OSGi issues if not done yet. － Freeman(Yue) Fang Red Hat, Inc. > On Jan 11, 2019, at 2:59 AM, Andrey Redko wrote: > > Hi Dennis, > > I will take a look tonight if no one does it before me. Thanks! > > Best Regards, >Andriy Redko > > On Thu,

Re: 3.3.0 soon?

+1, we should be ready to go. － Freeman(Yue) Fang Red Hat, Inc. > On Jan 21, 2019, at 9:06 PM, Dennis Kieselhorst wrote: > > Hi, > > in my view everything we discussed is finished. So we can cut a release and > start a vote, can't we? > > Cheers > Dennis

Re: CXF 3.1 and Java 11

Hi Gary, No, there would be lots of other things won’t run with JDK11 on CXF 3.1.x. We support JDK11 for upcoming CXF 3.3. － Freeman(Yue) Fang Red Hat, Inc. > On Jan 24, 2019, at 6:02 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > Hi All, > > Is there any hope in trying to get CXF 3.1.17 runn

Re: [VOTE] CXF 3.2.8

+1 Thanks! － Freeman(Yue) Fang Red Hat, Inc. > On Jan 25, 2019, at 5:36 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote: > > It’s been 3 months since 3.2.7 so we should do another release. We’ve fixed > 18 JIRA issues > > Staging area: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachec

Re: [VOTE] CXF 3.3.0 and CXF XJC Utils 3.3.0

+1 Thanks! － Freeman(Yue) Fang Red Hat, Inc. > On Jan 25, 2019, at 5:33 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote: > > This is a vote to release Apache CXF 3.3.0 and the XJC Utils 3.3.0 it needs. > The main new feature is support for Java 11, but there are a bunch of other > updates and enhan

Re: Corba and JDK9+

Hi Dennis, As corba API was removed since JDK11, and I can’t find a equivalent 3rd party lib so far as replacement, so with JDK11 we can’t support Corba. We will see if we can for CXF 3.3.1, but I doubt it as Corba is quite old(though absolutely has glorious history) － Freeman(Yue)

Re: [VOTE] CXF 3.3.0 and CXF XJC Utils 3.3.0

Hi Dennis, As corba API was removed since JDK11, and I can’t find a equivalent 3rd party lib so far as replacement, so with JDK11 we can’t support Corba. We will see if we can for CXF 3.3.1, but I doubt it as Corba is quite old(though absolutely has glorious history). We may need to add this i

Re: Corba and JDK9+

t cool anymore (however, it was kind of Microservices > Architecture back then...). > > I don't have much spare time to work on this, but maybe you could create > CXF jira issue with very low priority and assign to me? > > regards > Grzegorz Grzybek > > pt., 2

Re: [VOTE] CXF 3.1.18

+1 Thanks Dan! － Freeman(Yue) Fang Red Hat, Inc. > On Jan 26, 2019, at 1:10 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote: > > > (Didn’t have time to do this yesterday with the others) > > It’s been 3 months since 3.1.17 so we should do another release. We’ve fixed > 11 JIRA issues > > Staging a

Re: Corba and JDK9+

2019, at 2:23 AM, Grzegorz Grzybek wrote: >> >> Oh - I can't assign to myself (I don't have permissions for CXF project. I >> have only for KARAF, CAMEL and ARIES). >> >> regards >> Grzegorz Grzybek >> >> pt., 25 sty 2019 o 10:31 Freema

Re: [VOTE] CXF 3.3.1

+1 Thanks! － Freeman(Yue) Fang Red Hat, Inc. > On Mar 1, 2019, at 2:56 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote: > > This is vote to release 3.3.1. This doesn’t fix a ton of issues (only 12), > but it does fix two relatively important regressions. > > Staging area: > https://repository.apach

Re: JDK13 build on Jenkins

Thanks Andriy! The result isn’t bad, some failures are in OSGi, that’s kind of expected, since Karaf 4.2.x not support JDK13 yet. Cheers － Freeman(Yue) Fang Red Hat, Inc. > On Mar 14, 2019, at 10:18 AM, Andriy Redko wrote: > > Hey guys, > > There is a new job configured on

Re: Create an offline copy of swagger.json created by Swagger2Feature CXF

Actually in CXF we also have java2swagger-plugin which I think you can use to generate swagger payload from your rest interface provided it has swagger annotation already. The configuration is like org.apache.cxf cxf-java2swagger-plugin

Re: Dropping JDK9 / JDK10 jobs from Jenkins

+1 Thanks! － Freeman(Yue) Fang Red Hat, Inc. > On May 22, 2019, at 9:48 PM, Andriy Redko wrote: > > Hey guys, > > I think we could drop CXF's JDK9 [0] and JDK10 [1] jobs from Jenkins > since these JDKs are officially dead. Any objections? > > [0] https://builds.apache.org/job

Re: CXF-Master-JDK11 - Build # 526 - Failure

Hi Andriy, Thanks for the update! － Freeman(Yue) Fang Red Hat, Inc. > On Jun 15, 2019, at 9:09 PM, Andriy Redko wrote: > > Hey guys, > > Some of our builds started to fail due to Maven toolchain misconfiguration > for JDK13, > the ticket has been submitted [1], hopefully we

Re: The need for multi-release JAR(s)

Hi Andriy, multi-release JAR makes sense for this scenario IMO. I’d say we were lucky we didn’t have to do this early, but eventually the API change in JDK add more complication in our build. Thanks! － Freeman(Yue) Fang Red Hat, Inc. > On Jul 10, 2019, at 10:29 PM, Andriy Red

Re: Releases

+1 from my side also Thanks Colm! － Freeman(Yue) Fang Red Hat, Inc. > On Aug 6, 2019, at 1:01 PM, Andrey Redko wrote: > > Hi Colm, > > Nothing pending on my side, all green for release train. > > Best Regards, >Andriy Redko > > On Tue, Aug 6, 2019, 10:03 AM Colm O hEige

Re: [VOTE] CXF 3.2.10, CXF 3.3.3, and buildutils 3.4.3

+1 Thanks Dan! － Freeman(Yue) Fang Red Hat, Inc. > On Aug 8, 2019, at 1:10 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote: > > This is vote to release CXF 3.2.10 and CXF 3.3.3. 3.3.3 also required the > release of cxf-build-utils 3.4.3 to pickup the new Checkstyle and PMD configs > required by the

Re: Flip master to 3.4, create 3.3.x-fixes

Yup, if we have to change the spec/api package name, probably CXF 4.x is a better version － Freeman(Yue) Fang Red Hat, Inc. > On Aug 8, 2019, at 2:58 PM, Dennis Kieselhorst wrote: > > Hi Andy! >> The Jakarta EE 8 release (due in September) is supposed to be binary >> compatibl

Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 3.3.5 and 3.2.12

+1 Thanks! Freeman On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 5:29 PM Daniel Kulp wrote: > After a couple of hiccups due to LDAP downtime, I was finally able to get > the builds staged. These releases are long overdue due to the > holidays. Over 30 JIRA issues have been fixed. > > > Tags: > Buildutils-3.4.4

Re: [cxf-fediz] 01/02: Update Jetty

t, Inc. Member and Committer of The Apache Software Foundation Linkedln <https://www.linkedin.com/in/freeman-fang-0979741a/>

Re: [cxf-fediz] 01/02: Update Jetty

Yeah, I think it's a good idea if Jetty 10 GA is available before CXF 3.4. Cheers Freeman On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 5:27 PM Dennis Kieselhorst wrote: > > I think I found the reason and fixed the test failure with jetty > > 9.4.25. > > Please see > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-8193

Re: [VOTE] CXF 3.3.6 and 3.2.13

+1(binding) Thanks! Freeman On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 2:38 PM Daniel Kulp wrote: > > This is a vote to release CXF 3.3.6 and 3.2.13. We’ve fixed over 30 JIRA > issues and it’s been over 2 months since the last set of releases. > > Staging repos: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositor

Re: update apache cxf to 3.3.x

Hi, Please give more info about your environment and the full stacktrace. Thanks! Freeman On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 9:35 PM kumar rishav wrote: > Hi > I got to know about this mail id from github. > I am facing one issue while updating apache cxf version from 3.2.x to 3.3. > > Error i am getting

Re: [VOTE] - Release Apache CXF Fediz 1.5.0

+1 (binding) Thanks! Freeman On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 6:14 AM Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote: > This is a vote to release Apache CXF Fediz 1.5.0. This is a major new > release with the following issues fixed: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12313420&version=123368

Re: [VOTE] CXF 3.3.7 and 3.2.14

+1 (binding) Thanks Dan! Freeman On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 5:02 PM Daniel Kulp wrote: > This is a vote to release CXF 3.3.7 and 3.2.14. We’ve fixed over 20 JIRA > issues and it’s been over 2 months since the last set of releases. > > Staging repos: > https://repository.apache.org/content/reposi

Re: [cxf] branch master updated: [CXF-8281]add a test for using Chinese as attachment file name

t; > > > The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/master by this push: > > new 247835a [CXF-8281]add a test for using Chinese as attachment file > name > > 247835a is described below > > > > commit 247835a2a4babb280bead861f102450f2e62f6a4 > > Autho

Re: [cxf] branch master updated: [CXF-8281]add a test for using Chinese as attachment file name

Hi Dennis, Seems jenkins machine can't understand the unicode file name. I just disabled the test in question for now. Best regards Freeman On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 12:39 PM Freeman Fang wrote: > Hi Dennis, > > Thanks for the reminder! > I will take a close look. > > Fre

Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 3.4.0

+1 Thanks Dan! Freeman On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 2:28 PM Daniel Kulp wrote: > This is a vote to release Apache CXF 3.4.0. There are several new > features, many dependency updates, bunches of fixes, etc…. See the > migration guide at: > http://cxf.apache.org/docs/34-migration-guide.html < > ht

Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 3.4.1 and 3.3.8

+1(binding) Thanks Dan! Freeman On Tue, Nov 3, 2020 at 4:30 PM Daniel Kulp wrote: > > This is a vote to release CXF 3.3.8 and 3.4.1. We’ve fixed over 20 JIRA > issues and it’s been over 2 months since the last set of releases. > > Staging repos: > https://repository.apache.org/content/reposit

Re: [VOTE] CXF 3.4.2/3.3.9

+1 Thanks Dan! And hope everyone has a nice holiday! Freeman On Wed, Dec 23, 2020 at 2:56 PM Daniel Kulp wrote: > This is a vote to release CXF 3.4.2 and 3.3.9. We have several fixes and > dependency updates that would be good to get into peoples hands before the > end of the year. > > > Sta

Re: Rare JDK 1.8 -> 15+ binary compatibility issue

Hi Andriy, This is a good idea, +1 for it. Thanks and Happy New Year! Freeman On Sat, Jan 9, 2021 at 12:10 PM Andriy Redko wrote: > Hey guys, > > Happy New Year to everyone! > > We have recently gotten an interesting issue reported [1] which basically > turned out > to be a rare binary compati

Re: Undertow CVE

Hi Colm and Grzegorz, Based on the facts 1. The CVE got fixed since Undertow 2.2.0(not in 2.1.5). 2. since Undertow 2.1.0, there is no OSGi support 3. CXF 3.4.x uses Undertow 2.1.x already 4. CXF OSGi features.xml cxf-http-undertow feature reuse pax-http-undertow, so always reuse the undertow ver

Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 3.4.3 and 3.3.10

+1 (binding) Thanks Dan! Freeman On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 4:59 PM Daniel Kulp wrote: > > This is a vote to release CXF 3.4.3 and 3.3.10. We have fixed over 20 > issues and it’s been almost 3 months since the last releases. > > > Staging repositories: > https://repository.apache.org/content/rep

Re: CXF-8436: proposed solution

Hi Jurrie, Please see my comments below inline Best Regards Freeman On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 3:01 PM Jurrie Overgoor < cxf.apache.org.mailingl...@jurr.org> wrote: > Hello everyone, > > I created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-8436. This is about > getting generated code that is "repr

Re: CXF endpoint unexpectedly unregistered

Hi Manuel, Thanks for the heads up! I will take a close look to see where we should address this problem. Cheers Freeman On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 11:55 AM Shenavai, Manuel wrote: > Hi everyone, > > we are using the camel-cxf component in Apache Camel and reported the > following problem to Came

Re: CXF endpoint unexpectedly unregistered

Hi Manuel, Just FYI, I created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-8533 and fixed this issue there. Your change in CXF is correct basically, I just revised to make it more specific. Thanks! Freeman On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 12:50 PM Freeman Fang wrote: > Hi Manuel, > > Thank

Re: Releases soon?

+1 for a new release. Thanks Colm! Freeman On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 4:25 AM Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote: > Hi all, > > It's been over two months since the last set of releases, shall we get > the next releases out soon? What remains to be fixed? > > Colm. >

Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 3.4.4 and 3.3.11

+1(binding) Thanks Dan! Freeman On Fri, Jun 4, 2021 at 3:41 PM Daniel Kulp wrote: > This is a vote to release CXF 3.4.4 and 3.3.11. We have fixed over 26 > issues and it’s been over 2 months since the last releases. > > > Staging repositories: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositor

Re: Failing build

03 AM Andriy Redko wrote: > Ah yeah, the snapshots problem, always, should be fixed now, thanks Colm! > > Best Regards, > Andriy Redko > > > COh> The build is failing for me with this commit: > > COh> commit 2d2b6443d93ebe40d752bf02d2b8c0432d103e87 > COh> Aut

Re: [DISCUSS] CXF 3.5.x and beyond

Hi Andriy, Thanks so much for your summary! I actually think we should support JDK8 as long as possible, given the fact that CXF is widely used, and some users are not that fast to adopt new JDK versions. Also CXF has started to support JDK11(even more recent JDK versions) for a while, so any kee

Re: [DISCUSS] CXF 3.5.x and beyond

nk you. > > Best Regards, > Andriy Redko > > On Wed, Aug 11, 2021, 10:10 AM Freeman Fang > wrote: > >> Hi Andriy, >> >> Thanks so much for your summary! >> >> I actually think we should support JDK8 as long as possible, given the >> fa

Re: Releases next week?

+1 Thanks! Freeman On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 11:49 AM Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote: > I believe we are well overdue getting new releases out, how does early > next week sound? > > Colm. >

Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 3.4.5 and 3.3.12

+1 (binding) Thanks Dan! Freeman On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 5:00 PM Daniel Kulp wrote: > > This is a vote to release CXF 3.4.5 and 3.3.12. We have fixed over 34 > issues and it’s been over 2 months since the last releases. > > > Staging repositories: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repos

Re: Jakarta XML binding

+1 Freeman On Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 2:37 PM Daniel Kulp wrote: > > Not 3.5 at this point. Moving everything from the Java.xml things over to > the Jakarta.xml things is technically a major incompatible change and > should likely be targeting a 4.0 unless we can somehow make sure we can > suppor

Re: Jakarta namespace and OSGI

Hi Guys, In Karaf features, we use specs bundles created from Apache Servicemix, which are using javax package name. Also in Apache Karaf, there is a specs module which is also using javax package name. Given the Karaf is a universal OSGi container and needs to support a lot more projects(Camel, A

Re: Jakarta namespace and OSGI

cents. Have a nice weekend! Freeman > Le sam. 6 nov. 2021 à 14:02, Freeman Fang a > écrit : > > > Hi Guys, > > > > In Karaf features, we use specs bundles created from Apache Servicemix, > > which are using javax package name. Also in Apache Karaf, there is a

Re: Jakarta namespace and OSGI

long the track, even though it's not a full support of > all > FF> features from CXF. So that we can get feedback earlier(like run JAXRS > TCK > FF> and see the result). Moving forward, everyone is free to make whatever > FF> contribution on cxf-module-jarkarta jars to ma

Re: Jakarta namespace and OSGI

at I proposed and started is to provide spec feature. We can have both > javax and Jakarta spec features and use the one needed. > > That’s probably the most flexible approach. > > FYI Karaf 4.3.3 already includes specs feature repo that we can extend. > > Regards > JB >

Re: Jakarta namespace and OSGI

g to > be a bundle or the pragmatists who would like to choose their own JakartaEE > API JARs. Someone may prefer canonical jakarta.* groupId but someone may be > forced to use SMX/Geronimo bundles which are more OSGi friendly > (locators/activators)... > > Also, Karaf is not the

Re: [VOTE] - Release Apache CXF Fediz 1.7.0

+1 Thanks Colm! Freeman On Wed, Nov 6, 2024 at 6:18 AM Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote: > This is a vote to release Apache CXF Fediz 1.7.0. This release > upgrades to CXF 3.6.4, hence JDK 11, and Jakarta. > > Artifacts: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecxf-1208/ > Git tag

Re: Releases (first weeks of December)?

Hi Team, Yes, I'm very glad to cut the release build when everything is ready. Cheers Freeman On Mon, Nov 25, 2024 at 4:37 PM Andriy Redko wrote: > Hey Colm, > > For 3.5.x / 3.6.x and 4.0.x there are two pull requests I would love to > get in [1], [2], would appreciate a look if possible, not

Re: Releases (first weeks of December)?

+1 to release in a few weeks. +1 to retire 3.5.x in the new future. Please let me know if you want me to cut the release build. Best Regards Freeman On Fri, Nov 15, 2024 at 8:15 AM Andriy Redko wrote: > Agree, thanks Colm for bringing this one up. I think once we get > 4.1.0 out of the door, w

Re: [VOTE] Apache cxf-build-utils 4.0.2

+1(binding) Thanks! Freeman On Sun, Dec 1, 2024 at 9:06 AM Andriy Redko wrote: > Hey folks, > > In preparation for CXF releases, this is vote to release cxf-build-utils > 4.0.2. > > Staging areas: > 4.0.2: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecxf-1209 > > Tags: > 4.0.2

Re: Releases (first weeks of December)?

Hi Andriy, Sure, I will kick the release build early next week. Cheers Freeman On Sun, Dec 1, 2024 at 4:38 PM Andriy Redko wrote: > Hey folks! > > It looks like we are good to go cutting 3.5.x / 3.6.x / 4.0.x, all > issues are resolved (or moved to later releases), and builds are green, > than

Re: [VOTE] Apache cxf-xjc-utils 4.1.0

+1(binding) Thanks! Freeman On Sun, Dec 1, 2024 at 9:24 AM Andriy Redko wrote: > Hey folks, > > In preparation for CXF releases, this is a vote to release cxf-xjc-utils > 4.1.0. > > Staging areas: > 4.1.0: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecxf-1210 > > Tags: > 4.1.0:

[VOTE] Release CXF 4.0.6, 3.6.5 and 3.5.10

Hi, It’s been a while since last releases and many issues have been addressed, so here is the VOTE for CXF 4.0.6, 3.6.5 and 3.5.10 Staging areas: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecxf-1211 https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecxf-1213 https://repos

Re: Releases (first weeks of December)?

oc.internal.tool.Start.begin(Start.java:344) > > [INFO] [ERROR] at > > jdk.javadoc/jdk.javadoc.internal.tool.Main.execute(Main.java:63) > > [INFO] [ERROR] at > > jdk.javadoc/jdk.javadoc.internal.tool.Main.main(Main.java:52) > > [INFO] [ERROR] Command line was: > > &g

Re: Releases (first weeks of December)?

t > >>> > jdk.javadoc/jdk.javadoc.internal.doclets.toolkit.AbstractDoclet.generateClassFiles(AbstractDoclet.java:268) > >>> [INFO] [ERROR] at > >>> > jdk.javadoc/jdk.javadoc.internal.doclets.toolkit.AbstractDoclet.startGeneration(AbstractDoclet.java:207) &g

Re: Releases (first weeks of December)?

Awesome Andriy! I will cut the build tomorrow! Freeman On Sun, Dec 8, 2024 at 6:02 PM Andriy Redko wrote: > Hi Freeman, > > The 4.1 release should be cleared out now! > Thanks! > > Best Regards, > Andriy Redko > > > Hi Andriy, > > > Thanks for the update! > > > Surely we can do it next week

Re: Releases (first weeks of December)?

Hi Andriy, I think we are ready to cut CXF 4.1 release build, right? Anything else you or others still want to get in? If not, I will start CXF 4.1 release build later today. Cheers Freeman On Sun, Dec 1, 2024 at 4:38 PM Andriy Redko wrote: > Hey folks! > > It looks like we are good to go cutt

Re: [VOTE] Release CXF 4.0.6, 3.6.5 and 3.5.10

Hi, With 7 binding +1s Alexey Markevich Andriy Redko Jeff Genender Jim Ma Francesco Chicchiriccò Alessio Soldano Freeman Fang 1 non-binding +1 Jamie Goodyear and no other votes, this vote passes and I will release the artifacts soon. Thanks all for the vote! Freeman On Wed, Dec 4, 2024 at 11

[VOTE] Release CXF 4.1.0

Hi, Here is the VOTE for Apache CXF 4.1.0. The biggest feature of Apache CXF 4.1.0 is Jakarta EE 10 compatibility, with more improvements and bug fixes. Staging area: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecxf-1214 tag: https://github.com/apache/cxf/commit/7fb95ad266e4a5ced5

Re: [VOTE] Release CXF 4.0.6, 3.6.5 and 3.5.10

+1 Freeman On Wed, Dec 4, 2024 at 11:19 AM Freeman Fang wrote: > Hi, > > It’s been a while since last releases and many issues have been addressed, > so here is the VOTE for CXF 4.0.6, 3.6.5 and 3.5.10 > > Staging areas: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositor

Re: Bug Report: Connection Leak in HttpClientWrappedOutputStream due to Unreleased Resources on IOException

Hi suxuan, Could you please fill a CXF jira ticket about this issue? Thanks! Freeman On Mon, Jan 6, 2025 at 1:06 AM suxuan xu wrote: > Dear Apache CXF Development Team, > > I would like to report a bug in the `HttpClientWrappedOutputStream` class > within the `org.apache.cxf.transport.http` p

Re: [Heads Up]When shall we schedule the next round of release?

Thanks Andriy! I can kick off the release build when you(and others) get all needed in. And +1 for the coming CXF 3.5.11 will be the last one of CXF 3.5.x. Cheers Freeman On Mon, Feb 3, 2025 at 2:17 PM Andriy Redko wrote: > Hi Freeman, > > I think we should be in a good shape to have releases

[Heads Up]When shall we schedule the next round of release?

Hi Team, Any ideas in mind when we expect the next round of release? Thanks! Freeman

Re: [Heads Up]When shall we schedule the next round of release?

Sure, thanks for the update Colm! Freeman On Tue, Feb 4, 2025 at 9:52 AM Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote: > I'd quite like to get WSS4J 4.0.0 out soon (next week I hope) so that > we can pick it up for CXF 4.1.1. > > Colm. > > On Mon, Feb 3, 2025 at 7:32 PM Freeman Fang

Re: [Heads Up]When shall we schedule the next round of release?

Thanks Colm for the update! Freeman On Sat, Feb 8, 2025 at 4:38 AM Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote: > Thanks Freeman, I've called a vote now on the WS dev list. > > Colm. > > On Fri, Feb 7, 2025 at 3:15 PM Freeman Fang > wrote: > > > > Thanks Colm for reviewing t

Re: [Heads Up]When shall we schedule the next round of release?

Thanks Colm for reviewing the patch! Done on the WSS4J side. Best Regards Freeman On Fri, Feb 7, 2025 at 9:08 AM Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote: > Hi @Freeman Fang , > > If you rebase the FIPS PR for WSS4J I'll merge it and start a vote. > > Colm. > > On Tue, Feb 4, 20

Re: [VOTE] Release CXF 4.1.0

Hi, With 7 binding +1s Andriy Redko Jeff Genender Francesco Chicchiriccò Alexey Markevich Colm O hEigeartaigh Jim Ma Freeman Fang 2 non-binding +1s Jamie Goodyear Mark Struberg and no other votes, this vote passes and I will release the artifacts soon. Thanks all for the vote! Freeman On Mon

Re: [VOTE] Release CXF 4.1.0

Here is my +1. On Mon, Dec 9, 2024 at 1:05 PM Freeman Fang wrote: > Hi, > > Here is the VOTE for Apache CXF 4.1.0. The biggest feature of Apache CXF > 4.1.0 is Jakarta EE 10 compatibility, with more improvements and bug fixes. > > Staging area: > https://reposito

Re: Releases (first weeks of December)?

ss this comes from that we recently bump maven-javadoc-plugin from 3.10.1 to 3.11.1, I will downgrade the maven-javadoc-plugin version and try again. Freeman On Sun, Dec 1, 2024 at 7:02 PM Freeman Fang wrote: > Hi Andriy, > > Sure, I will kick the release build early next week. > > C

Re: Releases (first weeks of December)?

Hi Andriy, Thanks for the update! Surely we can do it next week, no rush, take your time! Best Regards Freeman On Fri, Dec 6, 2024 at 9:52 AM Andriy Redko wrote: > Hey Freeman, > > We are mostly ready, updating the cxf-xjc-utils and cxf-build-tools. Do > you mind cutting 4.1 Monday next week?

Re: [VOTE] Apache cxf-build-utils 4.1.1

+1 Thanks Andriy! Freeman On Sat, May 3, 2025 at 2:26 PM Andriy Redko wrote: > Hey folks, > > In preparation for CXF releases, this is vote to release cxf-build-utils > 4.1.1. > > Staging areas: > 4.1.1: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecxf-1221 > > Tags: > 4.1.1: >

Re: Releases soon?

+1 And I will kick off the release build once build-utils is out. Cheers Freeman On Sun, Apr 20, 2025 at 1:31 PM Andriy Redko wrote: > Hey folks! > > Happy Easter (to ones who celebrate)! It's been a while since last CXF > releases, > any objections to drop new ones soon? In no, I will start o

Re: [Heads Up]When shall we schedule the next round of release?

t; > >> Thanks Colm! > > >> Andriy, do you want to get anything else in? > >> Freeman > > >> On Fri, Feb 28, 2025 at 8:36 AM Colm O hEigeartaigh < > cohei...@apache.org> > >> wrote: > > >>> Hi, > > >>> I'

Re: [VOTE] Release CXF 4.1.1, 4.0.7, 3.6.6 and 3.5.11

And here is my +1 Cheers Freeman On Mon, Mar 3, 2025 at 3:53 PM Freeman Fang wrote: > Hi, > > It’s been a while since last releases and many issues have been addressed, > so here is the VOTE for CXF 4.1.1, 4.0.7, 3.6.6 and 3.5.11 > > Staging areas: > > https://repos

Re: [VOTE] Release CXF 4.1.1, 4.0.7, 3.6.6 and 3.5.11

Hi Team, With 7 binding +1s Andriy Redko Alexey Markevich Francesco Chicchiriccò Jeff Genender Colm O hEigeartaigh Alessio Soldano Freeman Fang 1 non-binding +1 Jamie Goodyear and no other votes, this vote passes and I will release the artifacts soon. Thanks all for the vote! Freeman On Mon

Re: [Heads Up]When shall we schedule the next round of release?

Thanks Colm! Andriy, do you want to get anything else in? Freeman On Fri, Feb 28, 2025 at 8:36 AM Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote: > Hi, > > I've released Build Utils 4.1.0 and updated CXF. > > Colm. > > On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 5:21 PM Freeman Fang > wrote: > &

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   >