part-mixed-mime-message-format
[3] https://cxf.apache.org/docs/message-logging.html
Best Regards,
Andriy Redko
JPU> Hi Andriy,
JPU> What is the correct way to annotate a file attachment as part of a
JPU> mutlipart/form-data content body?
JPU> I currently have the following (o
+1, thanks Colm!
On Wed, Nov 6, 2024, 6:18 a.m. Colm O hEigeartaigh
wrote:
> This is a vote to release Apache CXF Fediz 1.7.0. This release
> upgrades to CXF 3.6.4, hence JDK 11, and Jakarta.
>
> Artifacts:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecxf-1208/
> Git tag: https:
ently (one difference is that the CXF
tests
use Hibernate Validator under the hood but it should not matter I believe, in
any
case I will try to run the tests with the library you are using).
Thanks.
[1] https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/2152
Best Regards,
Andriy Redko
> If I de
/2107
[2] https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/2018
Best Regards,
Andriy Redko
On Mon, Nov 25, 2024, 4:51 a.m. Colm O hEigeartaigh
wrote:
> Hey Andriy,
>
> Are we close to closing out 4.1.0 or the other votes? Is there
> anything that we should look into to speed things along
contract (interface). WebClient does not
introspect
anything and could only use base address (from client proxy), as far as I know.
Thanks.
Best Regards,
Andriy Redko
> If I deactivate the bean validation feature in createMagdadocServer(...)
> it works.
> Some further questi
rence to the header Content-ID in
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Headers.
Content-ID is not a HTTP header but "cid:" from
https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2392.txt,
as you also referred to.
Thanks!
Best Regards,
Andriy Redko
> Hi Andriy,
> The opti
Hi Freeman,
Thanks a lot! Next week there are number of Spring related releases, so we
could plan to cut the release builds at the end of the next week. Thanks!
Best Regards,
Andriy Redko
> +1 to release in a few weeks.
> +1 to retire 3.5.x in the new future.
> Please let me kn
the same Idempotency Key.") String idempotencyKey,
@FormDataParam(value="messageToSend")
@Parameter(required=true,schema =
@Schema(implementation=MessageToSend.class)) @Multipart(value =
"messageToSend", type="application/json", required= true) Message
Agree, thanks Colm for bringing this one up. I think once we get
4.1.0 out of the door, we could announce EOL for 3.5.x within the
timeline you've suggested. Thanks!
Best Regards,
Andriy Redko
Friday, November 15, 2024, 5:51:38 AM, you wrote:
COh> +1, but I don't think
take a look shortly why it does not work. What kind
of
exception are you getting?
Thank you.
Best Regards,
Andriy Redko
JPU> Hi Andriy,
JPU> When looking at the classes MultipartProvider and JAXRSUtils (cxf v3.5.9)
JPU> then it shows that only object for which a 'Content-Dis
folks? Thanks!
Best Regards,
Andriy Redko
tity(builder, "multipart/form-data"));
It works perfectly when the unified Attachment body part is used. I also
crafted the test case over
here [1], to help you out to get it working or point me out if there is a gap
here that I missed.
Thank you.
[1] https://github.com/a
Regards,
Andriy Redko
(in a vote
now).
@Freeman, would you mind please to take care of cutting and sending the
release vote for 3.5.x / 3.6.x / 4.0.x?
Thank you!
Best Regards,
Andriy Redko
> Hi Team,
> Yes, I'm very glad to cut the release build when everything is ready.
> Cheers
> Freem
!
Best Regards,
Andriy Redko
+1, thanks a lot Freeman!
Best Regards,
Andriy Redko
> Hi,
> It’s been a while since last releases and many issues have been addressed,
> so here is the VOTE for CXF 4.0.6, 3.6.5 and 3.5.10
> Staging areas:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachec
5:00
[INFO]
Could you please help me out with the command line? I am wondering if it could
be local environment issue, do you
want me to try to cut the releases?
Thank you!
Best Regards,
Andriy Redko
> Hi Andriy,
> Thanks for the feedback!
> It turned out migh
Hi Freeman,
The 4.1 release should be cleared out now!
Thanks!
Best Regards,
Andriy Redko
> Hi Andriy,
> Thanks for the update!
> Surely we can do it next week, no rush, take your time!
> Best Regards
> Freeman
> On Fri, Dec 6, 2024 at 9:52 AM Andriy Redko wrot
Hey Folks,
We have 7 +1 votes and no other votes, so this vote passes and I will
release the artifacts soon. Thanks all for the vote!
Best Regards,
Andriy Redko
> +1.
> Colm.
> On Mon, Dec 2, 2024 at 5:52 PM wrote:
>> +1
>> Jeff
>>> On Dec 1, 2024, at 8
+1, thanks Freeman!
Best Regards,
Andriy Redko
> Hi,
> Here is the VOTE for Apache CXF 4.1.0. The biggest feature of Apache CXF
> 4.1.0 is Jakarta EE 10 compatibility, with more improvements and bug fixes.
> Staging area:
> https://repository.apache.org/conte
last
one for 3.5.x line.
Thank you!
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-9039
Best Regards,
Andriy Redko
FF> Hi Team,
FF> Any ideas in mind when we expect the next round of release?
FF> Thanks!
FF> Freeman
/com.sun.org.apache.xalan.internal.xsltc.trax.TransformerImpl.transform(TransformerImpl.java:775)
~[na:na]
... 42 common frames omitted
Could you please share a branch here [1] for Camel 2.x that works for you?
Thank you.
[1] https://github.com/mash-sap/cxfOneWayError
Best Regards,
Andriy Redko
?
From CXF side, moving the OSGI / Karaf into the separate repo would reduce the
maintenance
burden for sure (leaving aside the fact that now cxf-karaf has to be
maintained).
Thanks!
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-9086
Best Regards,
Andriy Redko
Friday, December 13
rds,
Andriy Redko
> Hey all,
> with 4.1.0 being out of the door now, I am curious if there is any timeline
> when you’re planning to integrate the (rather small) changes for MP Rest
> Client 4.0 so we could potentially move TomEE to being MicroProfile 7.0
> compatible.
> Will
g/projects/cxf-release-2024dec/cxf/rt/ws/security/target/reports/apidocs'
> dir.
> Seems there is a related JDK issue
> https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8242564
> which is fixed for JDK 23, but for CXF 3.6.x we need to use JDK11.
> I don't see this error when building CXF
Hey Folks,
We have 7 +1 votes and no other votes, so this vote passes and I will
release the artifacts soon.
Thanks all for the vote!
Best Regards,
Andriy Redko
> +1.
> Colm.
> On Mon, Dec 2, 2024 at 5:52 PM wrote:
>> +1
>> Jeff
>>> On Dec 1, 2
me to come up with the
fix, I hope to wrap it up during
the weekend.
Thanks!
[1] https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/2081
Best Regards,
Andriy Redko
> Hi Andriy,
> I think we are ready to cut CXF 4.1 release build, right? Anything else you
> or others still want to get in?
Hey folks!
Happy Easter (to ones who celebrate)! It's been a while since last CXF releases,
any objections to drop new ones soon? In no, I will start off with build-utils
next week as a preparation. Thanks!
Best Regards,
Andriy Redko
!
Best Regards,
Andriy Redko
Hey Freeman,
There is only one [1] that I hope to get in over the weekend, we should be
good for the release next week I believe. Thanks folks!
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-9110
Best Regards,
Andriy Redko
Friday, February 28, 2025, 9:29:04 AM, you wrote:
> Thanks C
Hey Folks,
I just merged the last pending bugfix (on my side), if nothing else left, we
should
be cleared for the releases. I sadly won't be available this week, although
should be
reachable by email, if anything pops up. Thanks!
Best Regards,
Andriy Redko
AR> Hey Freeman,
AR>
+1, thanks Freeman!
Best Regards,
Andriy Redko
On Mon, Mar 3, 2025, 3:55 p.m. Freeman Fang wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It’s been a while since last releases and many issues have been addressed,
> so here is the VOTE for CXF 4.1.1, 4.0.7, 3.6.6 and 3.5.11
>
> Stagin
ndriy Redko
> Hi Team,
> With 7 binding +1s
> Andriy Redko
> Alexey Markevich
> Francesco Chicchiriccò
> Jeff Genender
> Colm O hEigeartaigh
> Alessio Soldano
> Freeman Fang
> 1 non-binding +1
> Jamie Goodyear
> and no other votes, this vote passes and I w
All good, thank you!
Best Regards,
Andriy Redko
On Fri, Feb 21, 2025, 2:36 p.m. wrote:
> Hi Andriy,
>
> I have raised [1] and [2] in Jira.
> Sorry I didn't raise them there in the first place.
>
> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-9113
> [2] http
Hi Sola-ris,
Could you please create issues here [1] for these bug reports, thank you.
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/
Best Regards,
Andriy Redko
On Fri, Feb 21, 2025, 1:15 p.m. wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> I would like to report two bugs in the JAX-RS frontend, hope this is the
&
gards,
Andriy Redko
On Fri, Feb 21, 2025, 9:40 a.m. Colm O hEigeartaigh
wrote:
> Hi Andriy and Freeman,
>
> What's left in terms of the new releases?
>
> Colm.
>
> On Sun, Feb 9, 2025 at 10:39 PM Freeman Fang
> wrote:
> >
> > Thanks Colm for the update!
> >
+1, thanks Colm!
Best Regards,
Andriy Redko
On Mon, Feb 24, 2025, 12:05 p.m. Colm O hEigeartaigh
wrote:
> This is a vote to release Apache CXF Build Utils 4.1.0. It features an
> update to PMD 7.x, which is a major new version (and also fixes a
> CVE).
>
> Art
+1, thanks Colm!
On Fri, Apr 4, 2025, 6:19 a.m. Colm O hEigeartaigh
wrote:
> This is a vote to release Apache CXF Fediz 1.7.1. It contains some
> dependency updates, notably a bump to CXF 3.6.6.
>
> Artifacts:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecxf-1220/
> Git tag: htt
Hey Folks,
We have 5 +1 votes and no other votes, so this vote passes and I will
release the artifacts soon. Thanks all for the vote!
Best Regards,
Andriy Redko
COh> +1.
COh> Colm.
COh> On Mon, May 5, 2025 at 3:12 PM wrote:
>>
>> +1
>>
>> Jeff
&
Hi Freeman,
Thanks a lot! I have 2 fixes that I would like to get it, hopefully till
Wed (they both are tagged with release labels). Otherwise, we should be good to
go.
Thanks!
Best Regards,
Andriy Redko
FF> Hi Team,
FF> If anyone wants anything in, please let me know. Otherwise
+1, thanks a lot Freeman!
Best Regards,
Andriy Redko
On Fri, May 16, 2025, 8:37 p.m. Freeman Fang wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It’s been a while since last releases and many issues have been addressed,
> so here is the VOTE for CXF 4.1.2, 4.0.8 and 3.6.7
>
> Stagin
Hi Jean,
Ah interesting, I briefly checked [1], [2] and indeed Content-ID is
not mentioned there. I will try to look over the weekend what is happening,
thank you.
[1] https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2388.html
[2] https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7578
Best Regards,
Andriy Redko
Hi Jean,
Thank you for the issue. As per my understanding, the deprecation
applies to multipart/form-data only, not others. Thank you.
Best Regards,
Andriy Redko
> Does this also apply to mutlipart/mixed and multipart/related content
> types?
> Anyway I crea
submitted to the service? Thank you.
Best Regards,
Andriy Redko
> Hi Andriy,
> Indeed, according to https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7578 - section-4.8
> only the headers Content-Type, Content-Disposition, and
> Content-Transfer-Encoding (in specific cases) are supported.
> Actu
Regards,
Andriy Redko
> Hi andriy,
> Indeed after omitting the Attachment::id property, which dropped the
> Content-ID header, it worked.
> However I couldn't get rid of the Content-Transfer-Encoding header, but
> the server seems to have no problem with it.
> Below t
Postman or even curl)?
(if that is possible). Since you have both payloads (+ headers), we could
try to pinpoint the problematic part(s). What do you think?
Thank you.
Best Regards,
Andriy Redko
> Hi Andriy,
> Now that I am starting to test with the test server of the service
> pro
k you.
Best Regards,
Andriy Redko
Wednesday, June 4, 2025, 5:22:37 AM, you wrote:
> Hi andriy,
>
> I am trying to configure the CXF logging feature for my JAXRS client to log
> the headers for the binary attachments but not the content. I thought that
> creating my client i
Hi Jean,
Yeah, my expectation was the same: that with logMultipart = true and
logBinary=false you should be able to see headers but not (binary) content.
Surprised this is not the case. Please feel free to create an issue with the
reproducer. Thank you.
Best Regards,
Andriy Redko
+1, thanks a lot Freeman!
Best Regards,
Andriy Redko
> Hi,
> It’s been a while since last releases and many issues have been addressed,
> so here is the VOTE for CXF 4.1.3, 4.0.9 and 3.6.8
> Staging areas:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachec
No worries , thanks a lot Freeman!
Best Regards,
Andriy Redko
On Wed, Jul 30, 2025, 9:32 a.m. Freeman Fang wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sorry to say we have to cancel this VOTE, I am re-cutting the release now
> and will send another VOTE very soon.
>
> Freeman
>
> On Mon,
+1, thanks a lot Freeman for re-cutting the release!
Best Regards,
Andriy Redko
On Wed, Jul 30, 2025, 7:24 p.m. Freeman Fang wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It’s been a while since last releases and many issues have been addressed,
> so here is the VOTE for CXF 4.1.3, 4.0.9 and 3.6.8
>
501 - 551 of 551 matches
Mail list logo
