Re: [PR] CXF-9082: Allow to modify sensitive header list [cxf]

reta commented on code in PR #2150: URL: https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/2150#discussion_r1845242065 ## rt/transports/http/src/main/java/org/apache/cxf/transport/http/Headers.java: ## @@ -580,4 +580,8 @@ public static String toHttpDate(Date date) { public static String t

Re: CXF JAX-RS: working with multipart form-data

Hi Jean, > The option to use a List or a MultipartBody does work, I've > testcases to confirm this. Correct, what I meant is if could keep the API contract as: Response api(Attachment a1, Attachment a2, Attachment a3) But (internally only) fold it to: Response api(List atts) So you wou

Re: [PR] Fix possible IllegalStateException when bundle is stopped [cxf]

reta merged PR #2144: URL: https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/2144 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cxf.apache.org For q

RE: CXF JAX-RS: working with multipart form-data

Hi Andriy, The option to use a List or a MultipartBody does work, I've testcases to confirm this. But it somehow breaks the original spec since trying to do a round trip engineering (spec->code->spec), the spec generated from the code (based on annotations) no longer reflects the input spec. Wha