[GitHub] [cxf] jimma commented on a diff in pull request #1022: [CXF-8787]:Fix sample build failures

jimma commented on code in PR #1022: URL: https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/1022#discussion_r1016271239 ## distribution/src/main/release/samples/pom.xml: ## @@ -240,108 +289,8 @@ - -java9-plus - -

Re: CXF 4.0.0 jakarta release

Yes. Spring is optional for CXF runtime for a long time. Now all CXF binary classes/artifacts are all JDK-11 version (class major version 55) as Andriy mentioned we set target/source to JDK-11. I believe this setting on CXF at the moment is the best option: - Users don't need to upgrade the J

Re: CXF 4.0.0 jakarta release

Hi, Ok so just to clarify it means 1. the cxf-core split (soap, rs, integration) is postponed > 4.x 2. the compiler setting is updated to add release (current setup is only source/target which does not guarantee that compiled with a jdk > version set in pom run on a lower jdk). Romain Manni-Bucau

[GitHub] [cxf] reta commented on a diff in pull request #1022: [CXF-8787]:Fix sample build failures

reta commented on code in PR #1022: URL: https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/1022#discussion_r1016645795 ## distribution/src/main/release/samples/pom.xml: ## @@ -240,108 +289,8 @@ - -java9-plus - -

[GitHub] [cxf] jimma commented on a diff in pull request #1022: [CXF-8787]:Fix sample build failures

jimma commented on code in PR #1022: URL: https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/1022#discussion_r1016662070 ## distribution/src/main/release/samples/pom.xml: ## @@ -240,108 +289,8 @@ - -java9-plus - -

[GitHub] [cxf] reta commented on a diff in pull request #1022: [CXF-8787]:Fix sample build failures

reta commented on code in PR #1022: URL: https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/1022#discussion_r1016671480 ## distribution/src/main/release/samples/pom.xml: ## @@ -240,108 +289,8 @@ - -java9-plus - -

[GitHub] [cxf] reta commented on a diff in pull request #1022: [CXF-8787]:Fix sample build failures

reta commented on code in PR #1022: URL: https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/1022#discussion_r1016673152 ## pom.xml: ## @@ -217,10 +217,9 @@ maven-compiler-plugin 3.10.1 -

[GitHub] [cxf] reta commented on a diff in pull request #1022: [CXF-8787]:Fix sample build failures

reta commented on code in PR #1022: URL: https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/1022#discussion_r1016673152 ## pom.xml: ## @@ -217,10 +217,9 @@ maven-compiler-plugin 3.10.1 -

[VOTE] - Move Apache CXF DOSGi to the attic

This is a vote to move Apache CXF DOSGi to the attic. There is very little activity for many years now (last commit 2.5 years ago - https://github.com/apache/cxf-dosgi/commits/main). Previous discussion thread: https://lists.apache.org/thread/tjq9058n161p7fk8137nonwlfqvm9gys +1 from me. Colm.

Re: [VOTE] - Move Apache CXF DOSGi to the attic

+1 Jeff > On Nov 8, 2022, at 7:54 AM, Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote: > > This is a vote to move Apache CXF DOSGi to the attic. There is very > little activity for many years now (last commit 2.5 years ago - > https://github.com/apache/cxf-dosgi/commits/main). > > Previous discussion thread: > http

Re: [VOTE] - Move Apache CXF DOSGi to the attic

+1 Thanks! Freeman On Tue, Nov 8, 2022 at 9:54 AM Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote: > This is a vote to move Apache CXF DOSGi to the attic. There is very > little activity for many years now (last commit 2.5 years ago - > https://github.com/apache/cxf-dosgi/commits/main). > > Previous discussion threa

Re: [VOTE] - Move Apache CXF DOSGi to the attic

+1, thanks Colm! Best Regards, Andriy Redko COh> This is a vote to move Apache CXF DOSGi to the attic. There is very COh> little activity for many years now (last commit 2.5 years ago - COh> https://github.com/apache/cxf-dosgi/commits/main). COh> Previous discussion thread: COh> https://list

Re: [VOTE] - Move Apache CXF DOSGi to the attic

+1 Thanks On Tue, Nov 8, 2022 at 3:59 PM Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote: > This is a vote to move Apache CXF DOSGi to the attic. There is very > little activity for many years now (last commit 2.5 years ago - > https://github.com/apache/cxf-dosgi/commits/main). > > Previous discussion thread: > http

Re: CXF 4.0.0 jakarta release

+1 I would suggest to deal with this in documentation, restricting runtime jdk support to JDK17+ is actually going to create problems to some integration (Spring is effectively optional already), while not really giving us much (if you know you use Spring, just use JDK17, no need for it to be mand

Re: [VOTE] - Move Apache CXF DOSGi to the attic

+1

Re: [VOTE] - Move Apache CXF DOSGi to the attic

+1 On 11/8/22, Dennis Kieselhorst wrote: > +1 >

[GitHub] [cxf] jimma commented on a diff in pull request #1022: [CXF-8787]:Fix sample build failures

jimma commented on code in PR #1022: URL: https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/1022#discussion_r1017328226 ## pom.xml: ## @@ -217,10 +217,9 @@ maven-compiler-plugin 3.10.1 -

[GitHub] [cxf] jimma commented on a diff in pull request #1022: [CXF-8787]:Fix sample build failures

jimma commented on code in PR #1022: URL: https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/1022#discussion_r1017332870 ## distribution/src/main/release/samples/pom.xml: ## @@ -240,108 +289,8 @@ - -java9-plus - -

[GitHub] [cxf] jimma merged pull request #1022: [CXF-8787]:Fix sample build failures

jimma merged PR #1022: URL: https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/1022 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cxf.apache.org For