reta commented on PR #912:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/912#issuecomment-1103852635
> Thanks @reta. When I try to upgrade WSS4J to use ehcache 3.10.0 I get this
error, any ideas?
>
@coheigea it seems like the repositories are not set properly: http:// is
blocked. I cou
reta commented on PR #912:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/912#issuecomment-1103854290
> The JPA tests are failing in rt/rs/security/oauth-parent/oauth2 - do we
need to follow https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/openjpa-jakarta-tips.html ?
Yeah, we are trying to go module by modu
coheigea commented on PR #912:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/912#issuecomment-1103855956
Thanks, it's in https://github.com/apache/ws-wss4j
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go
Hi Jim,
Without it, on JDK11 we will see META-INF.versions.11 from the export
package part, and we don't want it. And this META-INF.versions.11 thing is
from the maven-compiler-plugin in java9-plus profile.
The expected Export-Package should be like
Export-Package:
org.apache.cxf.tracing;version
Hi Freeman,
Are you saying we can remove this java9-plus profile completely from 3.4.x
to 4.x?
Cheers,
Jim
On Wed, Apr 20, 2022 at 10:45 PM Freeman Fang
wrote:
> Hi Jim,
>
> Without it, on JDK11 we will see META-INF.versions.11 from the export
> package part, and we don't want it. And this MET
Hi Jim,
I mean remove it from CXF 4.x which is JDK11 minimum.
Freeman
On Wed, Apr 20, 2022 at 8:45 PM Jim Ma wrote:
> Hi Freeman,
> Are you saying we can remove this java9-plus profile completely from 3.4.x
> to 4.x?
>
> Cheers,
> Jim
>
> On Wed, Apr 20, 2022 at 10:45 PM Freeman Fang
> wrote:
I think we can remove this profile from 3.4.x and 3.5.x too. There is no
reason we should still keep this, right ?
I tried to build 3.4.x/3.5.x with jdk11, and the Export-Package entry in
META-INF is generated as expected.
On Thu, Apr 21, 2022 at 10:25 AM Freeman Fang
wrote:
> Hi Jim,
>
> I me
