mmoayyed opened a new pull request #833:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/833
Avoid errors when building on JDK 11:
```
"[ERROR]
/home/jitpack/build/rt/security-saml/src/main/java/org/apache/cxf/rt/security/saml/utils/SAMLUtils.java:[37,36]
cannot access org.apache.wss4j.c
On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 10:05 AM Andriy Redko wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> I would like to initiate (or better to say, resume) the discussion
> regarding CXF 3.5.x and beyond.
> The 3.5.x has been in the making for quite a while but has not seen any
> releases yet. As far as
> I know, we have only pen
Hey Jim, Romain,
Thank you guys, I think Romain's suggestion to move 3.5.x to JDK-11 baseline is
good idea, we would
still be maintaining 3.4.x for a while, covering JDK-8 based deployments.
Regarding Jakarta, yes, I
certainly remember the discussion regarding the build time approach, personall
Thanks for the summary Andriy, I like #3
Option #3:
- release 3.5.0 in preparation to JDK-17 LTS, use JDK-11 as baseline
- move master to 4.x to continue the work on supporting Jakarta 9.0+,
with JDK-11 as the minimal
required JDK version (Jetty 11, ...)
+ maintaining 3.4.x for JDK-8 and
On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 8:26 PM Andriy Redko wrote:
> Hey Jim, Romain,
>
> Thank you guys, I think Romain's suggestion to move 3.5.x to JDK-11
> baseline is good idea, we would
> still be maintaining 3.4.x for a while, covering JDK-8 based deployments.
> Regarding Jakarta, yes, I
> certainly reme
Le mer. 11 août 2021 à 14:27, Andriy Redko a écrit :
> Hey Jim, Romain,
>
> Thank you guys, I think Romain's suggestion to move 3.5.x to JDK-11
> baseline is good idea, we would
> still be maintaining 3.4.x for a while, covering JDK-8 based deployments.
> Regarding Jakarta, yes, I
> certainly rem
Hi Andriy,
Thanks so much for your summary!
I actually think we should support JDK8 as long as possible, given the fact
that CXF is widely used, and some users are not that fast to adopt new JDK
versions. Also CXF has started to support JDK11(even more recent JDK
versions) for a while, so any kee
Thanks a lot Feeman, this is basically the Option #1, or you suggest to
stay on JDK-8 for Jakarta 4.x branch as well? Thank you.
Best Regards,
Andriy Redko
On Wed, Aug 11, 2021, 10:10 AM Freeman Fang wrote:
> Hi Andriy,
>
> Thanks so much for your summary!
>
> I actually think we should sup
Sorry for not being very clear.
No, for Jakarta 4.x branch we definitely can move to JDK11.
Thanks!
Freeman
On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 11:05 AM Andrey Redko wrote:
> Thanks a lot Feeman, this is basically the Option #1, or you suggest to
> stay on JDK-8 for Jakarta 4.x branch as well? Thank you.
Awesome, so this is Option #1, thank you!
Best Regards,
Andriy Redko
On Wed, Aug 11, 2021, 11:13 AM Freeman Fang wrote:
> Sorry for not being very clear.
>
> No, for Jakarta 4.x branch we definitely can move to JDK11.
>
> Thanks!
> Freeman
>
> On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 11:05 AM Andrey Redko
I’m very strongly in favor of Option #1 at this point, with a “release note”
mentioning that 3.5.x will be the last series to support Java8.
I know we have plenty of services running with Java8 and have several customers
that are still targeting Java8. I really think we need to keep Java8 as an
11 matches
Mail list logo
