Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 2.7.10

2014-02-05 Thread Colm O hEigeartaigh
+1. Colm. On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 3:18 AM, Dennis Sosnoski wrote: > +1 > > - Dennis > > > On 02/05/2014 04:08 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote: > >> This is a vote to release 2.7.10. This is mostly to fix the JAX-WS 2.2 >> problems in the 2.7.9 release that would not allow it to work as a 2.2 >> runtim

Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 2.7.10

2014-02-05 Thread Sergey Beryozkin
+1 Sergey On 05/02/14 03:08, Daniel Kulp wrote: This is a vote to release 2.7.10. This is mostly to fix the JAX-WS 2.2 problems in the 2.7.9 release that would not allow it to work as a 2.2 runtime. Also has a couple other minor fixes. Staging area: https://repository.apache.org/content/r

Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 2.7.10

2014-02-05 Thread Aki Yoshida
+1 Aki 2014-02-05 Daniel Kulp : > > This is a vote to release 2.7.10. This is mostly to fix the JAX-WS 2.2 > problems in the 2.7.9 release that would not allow it to work as a 2.2 > runtime. Also has a couple other minor fixes. > > > Staging area: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repo

Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 2.7.10

2014-02-05 Thread Ulhas Bhole
+1, -- Ulhas Bhole On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 1:53 PM, Aki Yoshida wrote: > +1 > > Aki > > 2014-02-05 Daniel Kulp : > > > > This is a vote to release 2.7.10. This is mostly to fix the JAX-WS 2.2 > problems in the 2.7.9 release that would not allow it to work as a 2.2 > runtime. Also has a couple

Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 2.7.10

2014-02-05 Thread Jeff Genender
+1 Jeff Daniel Kulp February 4, 2014 at 8:08 PM This is a vote to release 2.7.10. This is mostly to fix the JAX-WS 2.2 problems in the 2.7.9 release that would not allow it to work as a 2.2 runtime. Also has a couple other minor fixes.Staging area:https://repository

RE: [VOTE] Apache CXF 2.7.10

2014-02-05 Thread Andrei Shakirin
+1 Regards, Andrei > -Original Message- > From: Daniel Kulp [mailto:dk...@apache.org] > Sent: Mittwoch, 5. Februar 2014 04:09 > To: dev@cxf.apache.org > Subject: [VOTE] Apache CXF 2.7.10 > > > This is a vote to release 2.7.10. This is mostly to fix the JAX-WS 2.2 > problems in > the 2

STSTokenValidator enhancements

2014-02-05 Thread Oliver Wulff
Hi there The STSTokenValidator is used to validate incoming credentials (ex. username/password) against the STS. The STSTokenValidator can be used for authentication for web services as well a REST services. REST security is already very enhanced to support claims based access control which re

REST security enhancements

2014-02-05 Thread Oliver Wulff
Hi there For the REST services of the Fediz IDP I'd like to support initially three security use cases. 1) Basic Authentication, Username/Password validated against the STS 2) Basic Authentication, Username/Password validated with JAAS 3) SAML token in Basic Authorization header In CXF 3.0, eac

Re: STSTokenValidator enhancements

2014-02-05 Thread Sergey Beryozkin
Hi Oli On 05/02/14 19:42, Oliver Wulff wrote: Hi there The STSTokenValidator is used to validate incoming credentials (ex. username/password) against the STS. The STSTokenValidator can be used for authentication for web services as well a REST services. REST security is already very enhanced

Re: REST security enhancements

2014-02-05 Thread Sergey Beryozkin
Hi Oli On 05/02/14 19:56, Oliver Wulff wrote: Hi there For the REST services of the Fediz IDP I'd like to support initially three security use cases. 1) Basic Authentication, Username/Password validated against the STS 2) Basic Authentication, Username/Password validated with JAAS I guess rea

JAXRSClient does not contain response headers

2014-02-05 Thread Thorsten Höger
Hi, I have a problem using the JAXRSClient with response headers. If the return value is of type javax.ws.rs.core.Response the returned instance does not contain response headers in some cases. I set up a test branch on github under https://github.com/hoegertn/cxf-spring-aop This repo contains a