+1 (non-binding)
> -Original Message-
> From: Daniel Kulp [mailto:dk...@apache.org]
> Sent: Mittwoch, 20. November 2013 17:21
> To: dev@cxf.apache.org
> Subject: [VOTE] Apache CXF 2.7.8/2.6.11
>
>
> We've resolved over 75 issues since 2.7.7 and almost 35 ported back to
> 2.6.11.
>
>
>
+1 (non-binding)
> -Original Message-
> From: Daniel Kulp [mailto:dk...@apache.org]
> Sent: Mittwoch, 20. November 2013 22:29
> To: dev@cxf.apache.org
> Subject: [VOTE] Apache CXF 3.0.0-milestone1
>
>
> We've done quite a lot of work toward 3.0.0. While we still have work to do,
> I thi
+1
Oli
From: Andrei Shakirin [ashaki...@talend.com]
Sent: 21 November 2013 09:54
To: dev@cxf.apache.org
Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache CXF 2.7.8/2.6.11
+1 (non-binding)
> -Original Message-
> From: Daniel Kulp [mailto:dk...@apache.org]
> Sent: Mittwo
+1.
Colm.
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 8:54 AM, Andrei Shakirin wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Daniel Kulp [mailto:dk...@apache.org]
> > Sent: Mittwoch, 20. November 2013 17:21
> > To: dev@cxf.apache.org
> > Subject: [VOTE] Apache CXF 2.7.8/2.6.11
> >
> >
> > We
+1.
Colm.
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 9:10 AM, Andrei Shakirin wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Daniel Kulp [mailto:dk...@apache.org]
> > Sent: Mittwoch, 20. November 2013 22:29
> > To: dev@cxf.apache.org
> > Subject: [VOTE] Apache CXF 3.0.0-milestone1
> >
> >
>
Yea, go ahead and make this change. I had been wondering about the xkms stuff
as it did seems to run a bit earlier than it should.
Dan
On Nov 21, 2013, at 10:34 AM, Aki Yoshida wrote:
> +1
> tested OK with cxf-2.7.8 with current camel and olingo.
> and with some manual tests on equinox.
>
+1
Christian
Am 20.11.2013 17:20, schrieb Daniel Kulp:
We've resolved over 75 issues since 2.7.7 and almost 35 ported back to 2.6.11.
List of issues:
2.6.11
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310511&version=12325006
2.7.8
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/R
+1
Christian
Am 20.11.2013 22:28, schrieb Daniel Kulp:
We’ve done quite a lot of work toward 3.0.0. While we still have work to do, I
think it’s a good idea to get a stable milestone release out that users can
depend on to start testing some of the new stuff and provide feedback about
some
+1
On 20/11/13 17:20, Daniel Kulp wrote:
We've resolved over 75 issues since 2.7.7 and almost 35 ported back to 2.6.11.
List of issues:
2.6.11
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310511&version=12325006
2.7.8
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa
+1
regards, aki
2013/11/20 Daniel Kulp :
>
> We’ve done quite a lot of work toward 3.0.0. While we still have work to do,
> I think it’s a good idea to get a stable milestone release out that users can
> depend on to start testing some of the new stuff and provide feedback about
> some of the
+1
On 20/11/13 22:28, Daniel Kulp wrote:
We’ve done quite a lot of work toward 3.0.0. While we still have work to do, I
think it’s a good idea to get a stable milestone release out that users can
depend on to start testing some of the new stuff and provide feedback about
some of the changes.
+1
tested OK with cxf-2.7.8 with current camel and olingo.
and with some manual tests on equinox.
the only minor thing I noticed was the build/test order that causes
the fresh clean install to fail at xkms.itests, as xkms.itests gets
executed before osgi/karaf is built and consequently the cxf fea
+1,
Ulhas Bhole
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 4:20 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
>
> We've resolved over 75 issues since 2.7.7 and almost 35 ported back to
> 2.6.11.
>
>
> List of issues:
> 2.6.11
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310511&version=12325006
> 2.7.8
>
> htt
+1,
-- Ulhas Bhole
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 9:28 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
>
> We’ve done quite a lot of work toward 3.0.0. While we still have work to
> do, I think it’s a good idea to get a stable milestone release out that
> users can depend on to start testing some of the new stuff and provid
14 matches
Mail list logo
