Hi,
I use the client api to invoke a webservice in the following way:
JaxWsProxyFactoryBean factory = new JaxWsProxyFactoryBean();
factory.setUsername("someuser");
factory.setPassword("somepwd");
factory.setAddress("https://someurl/Webservice";); // HTTP DIGEST
Au
We've resolved over 75 issues since 2.7.7 and almost 35 ported back to 2.6.11.
List of issues:
2.6.11
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310511&version=12325006
2.7.8
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310511&version=12325005
The M
+1
Jeff
On Nov 20, 2013, at 8:20 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
>
> We've resolved over 75 issues since 2.7.7 and almost 35 ported back to 2.6.11.
>
>
> List of issues:
> 2.6.11
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310511&version=12325006
> 2.7.8
> https://issues.apa
Ouch, the 'nest' effort does not sound as if it was meant to be the
'best' effort, sigh :-)
Sergey
On 20/11/13 16:58, serg...@apache.org wrote:
Author: sergeyb
Date: Wed Nov 20 16:58:04 2013
New Revision: 1543874
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1543874
Log:
[CXF-5308] Making the nest effort in Abs
+1
Sergey
On 20/11/13 16:20, Daniel Kulp wrote:
We've resolved over 75 issues since 2.7.7 and almost 35 ported back to 2.6.11.
List of issues:
2.6.11
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310511&version=12325006
2.7.8
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseN
+1
David
On 20 November 2013 16:20, Daniel Kulp wrote:
>
> We've resolved over 75 issues since 2.7.7 and almost 35 ported back to 2.6.11.
>
>
> List of issues:
> 2.6.11
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310511&version=12325006
> 2.7.8
> https://issues.apache.or
+1
- Dennis
On 11/21/2013 05:20 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
We've resolved over 75 issues since 2.7.7 and almost 35 ported back to 2.6.11.
List of issues:
2.6.11
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310511&version=12325006
2.7.8
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure
We’ve done quite a lot of work toward 3.0.0. While we still have work to do, I
think it’s a good idea to get a stable milestone release out that users can
depend on to start testing some of the new stuff and provide feedback about
some of the changes. I didn’t really want to call it an alp
+1
- Dennis
On 11/21/2013 10:28 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
We’ve done quite a lot of work toward 3.0.0. While we still have work to do, I
think it’s a good idea to get a stable milestone release out that users can
depend on to start testing some of the new stuff and provide feedback about
som
+1 !
Thanks, Sergey
On 20/11/13 21:28, Daniel Kulp wrote:
We’ve done quite a lot of work toward 3.0.0. While we still have work to do, I
think it’s a good idea to get a stable milestone release out that users can
depend on to start testing some of the new stuff and provide feedback about
so
+1
Jeff
Daniel Kulp
November 20, 2013
at 1:28 PM
We’ve done quite a lot of
work toward 3.0.0. While we still have work to do, I think it’s a good
idea to get a stable milestone release out that users can depend on to
start testing some of the new stuff and provide fee
+1
Thanks
-
Freeman(Yue) Fang
Red Hat, Inc.
FuseSource is now part of Red Hat
On 2013-11-21, at 上午5:28, Daniel Kulp wrote:
>
> We’ve done quite a lot of work toward 3.0.0. While we still have work to do,
> I think it’s a good idea to get a stable milestone release out that user
+1
-
Freeman(Yue) Fang
Red Hat, Inc.
FuseSource is now part of Red Hat
On 2013-11-21, at 上午12:20, Daniel Kulp wrote:
>
> We've resolved over 75 issues since 2.7.7 and almost 35 ported back to 2.6.11.
>
>
> List of issues:
> 2.6.11
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Release
13 matches
Mail list logo