2011/9/1 Daniel Kulp :
> On Wednesday, August 31, 2011 11:27:20 PM Aki Yoshida wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I would like to hear your opinion on the following issue which I
>> encountered while fixing CXF-3768. The original problem reported in
>> CX-3768 is not related to WS-RM.
>> However, fixing this issue h
2011/9/1 Dennis Sosnoski :
> On 09/01/2011 12:51 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
>> On Wednesday, August 31, 2011 11:27:20 PM Aki Yoshida wrote:
>>
>>> For example, when a WS-RM client with a decoupled endpoint sends an
>>> application message, the WS-RM server returns simply an HTTP 202
>>> response with
Dear CXF community...
Hey, it was a lot of fun contributing! But I've deciding to spend my
free time in other spaces moving forward.
I may be back in the future, but in the interim, thanks for having
me... c'ya.
-- Robert
--
Sincerely,
Robert J. Liguori
I get an error message when i run the class "SimpleService_P1_Client" after
running in the class "SimpleService_P1_Service". The error message is showed
in the attached image file. the wsdl file i use is also attached.
so how can i resolve this problem.
--
El idrissi Amine
Ingénieur en génie logic
On 09/01/2011 09:15 PM, Aki Yoshida wrote:
> As Dennis says in his reply, the RM spec doesn't talk about this
> transportation binding specific part. The reason, I suppose, is that
> this is implicitly covered by the normal WS BP profile that recommends
> the use of HTTP 202 if there is nothing to
