+1
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 3:37 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
>
>
> We've resolved over 58 issues since 2.3.4 and thus is time for a release.
>
> This is take #2 fixing the attachment issue I found while testing with Camel.
>
>
> List of issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?p
+1
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 3:38 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
>
> We've resolved over 100 issues since 2.4.1 and thus is time for a release.
>
> This is take #2 fixing the attachment issue I found while testing with Camel.
>
> List of issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?proj
+1
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Kulp [mailto:dk...@apache.org]
Sent: 10 June 2011 03:38
To: dev@cxf.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache CXF 2.3.5 - take 2
We've resolved over 58 issues since 2.3.4 and thus is time for a release.
This is take #2 fixing the attachment issue I f
+1
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Kulp [mailto:dk...@apache.org]
Sent: 10 June 2011 03:38
To: dev@cxf.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache CXF 2.4.1 - take 2
We've resolved over 100 issues since 2.4.1 and thus is time for a release.
This is take #2 fixing the attachment issue I f
+1
Christian
Am 10.06.2011 04:37, schrieb Daniel Kulp:
We've resolved over 58 issues since 2.3.4 and thus is time for a release.
This is take #2 fixing the attachment issue I found while testing with Camel.
List of issues:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=123
+1
Christian
Am 10.06.2011 04:38, schrieb Daniel Kulp:
We've resolved over 100 issues since 2.4.1 and thus is time for a release.
This is take #2 fixing the attachment issue I found while testing with Camel.
List of issues:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=1231
I want to start a discussion about removing the JBI related modules on trunk.
There is the JBI binding, JBI transport, and the JBI integration module that,
IMO, could be removed.
Basically, if you are using CXF in JBI, you are most likely using the CXF
BC/SE components from ServiceMix, not
+1
Willem
On 6/10/11 10:38 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
We've resolved over 100 issues since 2.4.1 and thus is time for a release.
This is take #2 fixing the attachment issue I found while testing with Camel.
List of issues:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310511&
Finally! ;-) Yes.. I think its a good idea.
Jeff
On Jun 10, 2011, at 6:57 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
>
> I want to start a discussion about removing the JBI related modules on trunk.
>
> There is the JBI binding, JBI transport, and the JBI integration module that,
> IMO, could be removed.
>
+1
Glen
Daniel Kulp wrote:
>
> We've resolved over 100 issues since 2.4.1 and thus is time for a release.
>
--
View this message in context:
http://cxf.547215.n5.nabble.com/VOTE-Release-Apache-CXF-2-4-1-take-2-tp4474979p4476203.html
Sent from the cxf-dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
+1
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 9:33 AM, Jeff Genender wrote:
> Finally! ;-) Yes.. I think its a good idea.
>
> Jeff
>
>
> On Jun 10, 2011, at 6:57 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
>
>>
>> I want to start a discussion about removing the JBI related modules on trunk.
>> There is the JBI binding, JBI transport,
+1
That sounds good
Christian
Am 10.06.2011 14:57, schrieb Daniel Kulp:
I want to start a discussion about removing the JBI related modules on trunk.
There is the JBI binding, JBI transport, and the JBI integration module that,
IMO, could be removed.
Basically, if you are using CXF in JBI, yo
+1
- Dennis
On 06/10/2011 02:37 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
>
> We've resolved over 58 issues since 2.3.4 and thus is time for a release.
>
> This is take #2 fixing the attachment issue I found while testing with Camel.
>
>
> List of issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?
+1
- Dennis
On 06/10/2011 02:38 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
> We've resolved over 100 issues since 2.4.1 and thus is time for a release.
>
> This is take #2 fixing the attachment issue I found while testing with Camel.
>
> List of issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?pro
+1
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 3:49 AM, Dennis Sosnoski wrote:
> +1
>
> - Dennis
>
>
> On 06/10/2011 02:38 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
>> We've resolved over 100 issues since 2.4.1 and thus is time for a release.
>>
>> This is take #2 fixing the attachment issue I found while testing with Camel.
>>
>> Li
+1
On 06/10/2011 04:37 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
We've resolved over 58 issues since 2.3.4 and thus is time for a release.
This is take #2 fixing the attachment issue I found while testing with Camel.
List of issues:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310511&vers
+1
On 06/10/2011 04:38 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
We've resolved over 100 issues since 2.4.1 and thus is time for a release.
This is take #2 fixing the attachment issue I found while testing with Camel.
List of issues:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310511&versi
17 matches
Mail list logo