On 10.01.2011 12:06, cohei...@apache.org wrote:
Author: coheigea
Date: Mon Jan 10 17:06:06 2011
New Revision: 1057283
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1057283&view=rev
Log:
[CXF-3236] - Add support for an Issued Token extracted from a SAML assertion
- Upgrading to use WSS4J 1.5.11-SNAPSHO
Does it make sense to have a CONTENT_TYPE key but no value for it -- any
legitimate use case? Otherwise it may be better (if possible) to throw
some runtime exception to alert the developer of the client or web
service provider that he or she is erroneously adding the CONTENT_TYPE
key but not
On Tuesday 11 January 2011 11:50:00 am Glen Mazza wrote:
> Does it make sense to have a CONTENT_TYPE key but no value for it -- any
> legitimate use case? Otherwise it may be better (if possible) to throw
> some runtime exception to alert the developer of the client or web
> service provider that
On Tuesday 11 January 2011 10:44:49 am Glen Mazza wrote:
> On 10.01.2011 12:06, cohei...@apache.org wrote:
> > Author: coheigea
> > Date: Mon Jan 10 17:06:06 2011
> > New Revision: 1057283
> >
> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1057283&view=rev
> > Log:
> > [CXF-3236] - Add support for an I
It doesn't matter as WSS4J does not seem to deploy nightly snapshots to the
Apache repository. At least that has been the case up until now [1]
It would be nice if the nightly snapshots were deployed from Hudson.
[1]
http://people.apache.org/maven-snapshot-repository/org/apache/ws/security/wss4j
On Tuesday 11 January 2011 8:02:27 pm David Valeri wrote:
> It doesn't matter as WSS4J does not seem to deploy nightly snapshots to the
> Apache repository. At least that has been the case up until now [1]
>
> It would be nice if the nightly snapshots were deployed from Hudson.
I believe they ar
