Re: Container integration systests and org.jvnet.jax-ws-common dependency

2010-09-15 Thread Alessio Soldano
Hi Dan, OK, thanks. For now I've added that just to the systests/container-integration/grizzly; I'll try to get in touch with someone at Sun/Oracle to push the artifacts to central. Cheers Alessio On 09/14/2010 09:43 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote: Bascially, I have "less" problems with using java.ne

Programmatic config of features in the Bus

2010-09-15 Thread Alessio Soldano
Hi Folks, looking at the org.apache.cxf.Bus interface, I see there's no way to set features there. The getFeatures() / setFeatures(Collection features) methods are only in the CXFBusImpl implementation. Is there a design reason behind this? I'm thinking it might be interesting to add the featu

Re: Programmatic config of features in the Bus

2010-09-15 Thread Alessio Soldano
On 09/15/2010 10:56 AM, Alessio Soldano wrote: Hi Folks, looking at the org.apache.cxf.Bus interface, I see there's no way to set features there. The getFeatures() / setFeatures(Collection features) methods are only in the CXFBusImpl implementation. Is there a design reason behind this? Re

Re: Programmatic config of features in the Bus

2010-09-15 Thread Daniel Kulp
On Wednesday 15 September 2010 8:37:05 am Alessio Soldano wrote: > On 09/15/2010 10:56 AM, Alessio Soldano wrote: > > Hi Folks, > > > > looking at the org.apache.cxf.Bus interface, I see there's no way to > > set features there. The getFeatures() / > > setFeatures(Collection features) methods a

Either my new JMS sample is confused or I am ...

2010-09-15 Thread Benson Margulies
This is from the java_first_jms sample that I cleaned up. Why is the URL in the server factory trivial? Why doesn't it need to state the host and the port? Is 61616 some sort of a default? Also, how would this look using the JAX-WS Endpoint class? boolean amqBroker = args.length > 0 && "-active

Re: Either my new JMS sample is confused or I am ...

2010-09-15 Thread Daniel Kulp
On Wednesday 15 September 2010 2:33:47 pm Benson Margulies wrote: > This is from the java_first_jms sample that I cleaned up. Why is the URL in > the server factory trivial? Why doesn't it need to state the host and the > port? Is 61616 some sort of a default? This is part of what Willem and I wer