The cxf.xml I just pasted is I modified to test .
Here is the original one which works before the soap jms change :
http://cxf.apache.org/transports/jms";
xmlns:jaxws='http://cxf.apache.org/jaxws'
xsi:schemaLocation='http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans
http://www.springframework.org/
We already replaced "http://cxf.apache.org/transports/jms"; with
"http://www.w3.org/2010/soapjms/"; in SOAPBindingFactory:
if ("http://cxf.apache.org/transports/jms".equals(config.getTransportURI()))
{
info.setTransportURI("http://www.w3.org/2010/soapjms/";);
config.setT
Hi Jim
On 9/14/10 1:27 PM, Jim Ma wrote:
Hi all ,
After this commit, the SoapJMSInInterceptor is added to check the
"SOAPJMS_conentType" and other key/value pairs in message header . It
requires the "SOAPJMS_contentType" and other properties added in the
jms message. Are such header (jms messa
On 9/14/10 4:01 PM, Jim Ma wrote:
We already replaced "http://cxf.apache.org/transports/jms"; with
"http://www.w3.org/2010/soapjms/"; in SOAPBindingFactory:
if ("http://cxf.apache.org/transports/jms".equals(config.getTransportURI()))
{
info.setTransportURI("http://www.w3.org/201
On 9/14/10 4:16 PM, Willem Jiang wrote:
On 9/14/10 4:01 PM, Jim Ma wrote:
We already replaced "http://cxf.apache.org/transports/jms"; with
"http://www.w3.org/2010/soapjms/"; in SOAPBindingFactory:
if
("http://cxf.apache.org/transports/jms".equals(config.getTransportURI()))
{
info.setTransportUR
On Tuesday 14 September 2010 8:47:34 am Willem Jiang wrote:
> On 9/14/10 4:16 PM, Willem Jiang wrote:
> After checking the change log and the chat log, I found why we have the
> upper codes. The upper codes is try to support to specify the address
> with JMS URI in code first model with JAXWS API (
Bascially, I have "less" problems with using java.net repos for test scope
things and in the modules only used for the tests. (systest/*) What I DON'T
want to see is any java.net requirements ending up in normal runtime scopes of
things end users might hit. (and I'd prefer no java.net things
Hi Tomasz
sorry for a delay
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 4:01 PM, Tomasz Oponowicz <
tomasz.oponow...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Sergey,
>
> Welcome everyone after quite long break.
>
> I've prepared sample user interface for "search capabilities" feature.
>
>
Great :-)
> Legend:
>
> * File [0]:
>
>
Hi Dan
On 9/14/10 11:06 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
On Tuesday 14 September 2010 8:47:34 am Willem Jiang wrote:
On 9/14/10 4:16 PM, Willem Jiang wrote:
After checking the change log and the chat log, I found why we have the
upper codes. The upper codes is try to support to specify the address
with JM
On Tuesday 14 September 2010 8:58:27 pm Willem Jiang wrote:
> Hi Dan
>
> On 9/14/10 11:06 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
> > On Tuesday 14 September 2010 8:47:34 am Willem Jiang wrote:
> >> On 9/14/10 4:16 PM, Willem Jiang wrote:
> >> After checking the change log and the chat log, I found why we have the
Hi Dan,
I agree with you and will commit a patch with your suggestion shortly.
Willem
On 9/15/10 9:23 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
On Tuesday 14 September 2010 8:58:27 pm Willem Jiang wrote:
Hi Dan
On 9/14/10 11:06 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
On Tuesday 14 September 2010 8:47:34 am Willem Jiang wrote:
11 matches
Mail list logo
