Re: DOSGI: Update to CXF 2.2.9

2010-07-19 Thread davidb
Hi Eoghan, On 17 July 2010 12:59, Eoghan Glynn wrote: >> Eoghan would you have some cycles? > > Yeah. Excellent! > A couple of things before I go ahead and cut the release: > > - can you update the release notes[1] with a summary of what's new in this > release? Done. > - does this TimeoutExc

Re: DOSGI: Update to CXF 2.2.9

2010-07-19 Thread Eoghan Glynn
Hi David, > This exception happens when the remote service doesn't appear within > the timeout... Any chance of running it again and see if it still > fails? OK, I ran the build a few more times and didn't see the same failure, so lets put that one down to a once-off aberration. However, when cu

Re: DOSGI: Update to CXF 2.2.9

2010-07-19 Thread davidb
Hi Eoghan, All I can say is that the system tests always work fine on my machine and that they also work fine on Hudson... http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/view/CXF/job/CXF-DOSGi/ Having said that, it's always a little tricky to get system tests right for all machines as there are so many th

Re: DOSGI: Update to CXF 2.2.9

2010-07-19 Thread Eoghan Glynn
OK, fair enough. One other small issue with the attach-sources in cxf-dosgi-remote-service- admin-interfaces being in the wrong phase (leaving the sources jar unsigned). Now fixed, so we should be good to go with this. I'll go ahead and call the release vote ... /Eoghan On 19 July 2010 17:33,

[VOTE] Release CXF dOSGi 1.2

2010-07-19 Thread Eoghan Glynn
Folks, I'm calling a vote to release CXF Distributed OSGi 1.2. In addition to providing the Reference Implementation to the OSGi Remote Services Specification, the CXF Distributed OSGi 1.2 release now also provides the Reference Implementation of the OSGi Remote Service Admin Specification versio

Re: [VOTE] Release CXF dOSGi 1.2

2010-07-19 Thread David Bosschaert
Hi Eoghan, The mail that you sent around contains two links for every artefact, one pointing at orgapachecxf-023 which I presume is the right one and another pointing at orgapachecxf-021 which I don't think is the right one :) Also tags to both 1.1 and 1.2 are in there... Cheers, David On 19 Ju