+1 for upgrading to Spring 3 and Jetty 7.
Cyrille
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 11:14 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
>
> Since we are getting close to having 2.3 ready to release, I'm kind of looking
> at the various deps to see if there are updates we should grab or not.
> Things like woodstox and abdera and
> I think we're ready for a release!
Great!
> Eoghan would you have some cycles?
Yeah.
A couple of things before I go ahead and cut the release:
- can you update the release notes[1] with a summary of what's new in this
release?
- does this TimeoutException[2] in TestExportService.testAccessE
I think +1 for Spring 3, if a company is going to make the leap to CXF 2.3,
they are probably willing to make the jump to Spring 3.0.
Would there actually be any @since 3.0 features you'd use from Spring? Or
would it be possible they could still operate with 2.5.6 by doing maven
excludes on th
On Saturday 17 July 2010 11:11:03 am Craig Tataryn wrote:
> I think +1 for Spring 3, if a company is going to make the leap to CXF 2.3,
> they are probably willing to make the jump to Spring 3.0.
>
> Would there actually be any @since 3.0 features you'd use from Spring? Or
> would it be possible
On Thursday 15 July 2010 9:53:28 pm Benson Margulies wrote:
> The continuation code is very different. I attached a first pass
> patch. It does not pass unit tests because I am completely flummoxed
> by mock, and I may not understand what's going on with the
> continuations.
Digging into this a bi
On 2010-07-17, at 11:00 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
> On Saturday 17 July 2010 11:11:03 am Craig Tataryn wrote:
>> I think +1 for Spring 3, if a company is going to make the leap to CXF 2.3,
>> they are probably willing to make the jump to Spring 3.0.
>>
>> Would there actually be any @since 3.0 feat
