Thanks Sergey for you quick reply. The "beanNames"attribute doenst work on
Service Beans. Is this by design. Even in the example the
"customerBean2,customerBean3" are not referred as service beans. Please
suggest
* *
*
*
On Saturday 19 June 2010 10:31:19 am Glen Mazza wrote:
> Problem fixed. I upgraded to Maven 2.2.1 and also nuked my local Maven
> repository in case a file used in the build process was corrupted. But
> the NPE while building CXF-API still occurred (I'm not sure why I said
> "mvn -Pfastinstall"
>
> Hi Łukasz, just in case you're not aware (highly unlikely), the link above
is now recommending the regular RFC 5849:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5849 instead of the draft link.
Yes I noticed this new recommendations some time ago and I am using it now.
Thanks for letting know.
Cheers,
Hi,
I've just commit changes at repository [1]. Changes from last version:
- Created Maven project structure;
- Configured 'maven-gwt-plugin' for automatic execute GWT compiler (to
convert Java to JavaScript);
- Added draft implementation of 'BootstrapStorage';
- Create sample configuration of 'A
>
> Hi - good to see the OAuth project going on - let us know if there's
anything that we can help with.
I've looked through the initial commits, looks good. I was about to tell
you a CXF 'application' code does not explicitly depends on Spring but
you've removed that one :-).
Agreed. L
Jim,
I just committed some changes that I think should work for us. Can you give
it a look?
Basically, in jaxws module, I've separated out the jaxws 2.2 specific stuff
into a separate source tree. I've added a "jaxws22" profile that will add
the 2.2 stuff into the build and setup the endo
Just to confirm, why should the default *not* be JAX-WS 2.2--is it because
2.1 is presently the default version in the JDK? Is setting the default to
2.1 meant to help developers of CXF or users of CXF (i.e., does this default
have any bearing on CXF usage or is just when programming CXF internal
On Monday 21 June 2010 2:48:18 pm Glen Mazza wrote:
> Just to confirm, why should the default *not* be JAX-WS 2.2--is it because
> 2.1 is presently the default version in the JDK? Is setting the default to
> 2.1 meant to help developers of CXF or users of CXF (i.e., does this
> default have any be
Hi,
I'm going to implement the second OAuth endpoint called: Resource Owner
Authorization.
I will explain briefly this endpoint to make my question more clear.
Client (third-party app) make request to mentioned endpoint in order to
obtain approval for accessing user (resource owner) resources.
ex
