Re: [VOTE] Release CXF 2.2.7

2010-03-19 Thread Ulhas Bhole
+1, -- Ulhas Bhole On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 1:21 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote: > > Once again, there have been a bunch of bug fixes and enhancements that > have been done compared to the 2.2.6 release. Over 55 JIRA issues > are resolved for 2.2.7. > > List of issues: > > https://issues.apache.org/jir

Re: JMX enabling in CXF 2.2.6

2010-03-19 Thread Ulhas Bhole
Thanks Eoghan for quick reply. I will try to update build.xml target and check. I was putting cxf.xml in $CXF_HOME/samples/wsdl_first_rpclit directory and I think it was picked up because when I ran client it did got AddressAlreadyInUse for JMX port and also I could connect to the server using JCon

Re: JMX enabling in CXF 2.2.6

2010-03-19 Thread Ulhas Bhole
Hi Eoghan, I did a few tests and it looks like if I try to connect to the process from JConsole it doesn't show CXF JMX stats. If I create a new connection using JMX URL and username/password (cxf/cxf) I do see the CXF MBean appearing. Thanks for the help. Regards, Ulhas Bhole I just did a few

Re: [VOTE] Release CXF 2.2.7

2010-03-19 Thread Sergey Beryozkin
+1 ! Sergey On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 1:21 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote: > > Once again, there have been a bunch of bug fixes and enhancements that > have been done compared to the 2.2.6 release. Over 55 JIRA issues > are resolved for 2.2.7. > > List of issues: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secur

Re: Google Summer of Code ideas.....

2010-03-19 Thread Benson Margulies
Javascript attribute support, he writes lamely. On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 10:24 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote: > > The Google Summer of Code program is starting up.   Last year, we had a very > good project completed (SOAP/JMS Spec) and significant work started toward the > SOAP/TCP stuff. > > At this poin

Re: JMX enabling in CXF 2.2.6

2010-03-19 Thread Eoghan Glynn
A-ha, my bad, I assumed you were using the remote process option ... so you just can't see the CXF MBeans when you connect via the jconsole local process option? That's easy, just ensure your injected InstrumentationManager bean picks up the *platform* MBeanServer as opposed to creating a fresh on

Re: [VOTE] Release CXF 2.2.7

2010-03-19 Thread Eoghan Glynn
+1 /Eoghan On 19 March 2010 01:21, Daniel Kulp wrote: > > Once again, there have been a bunch of bug fixes and enhancements that > have been done compared to the 2.2.6 release. Over 55 JIRA issues > are resolved for 2.2.7. > > List of issues: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseN

Re: Google Summer of Code ideas.....

2010-03-19 Thread Sergey Beryozkin
- Simple and lightweight Atom HTML-based browser supporting feed links (next/previous/first/last) based on the existing CXF JAXRS WebClient API to be added to a rt/management-web component and which will be used for browsing the CXF logs. This browser will let users see the contents of the current

Moving org.apache.cxf.jaxb.attachment from cxf-rt-databinding-jaxb to cxf-common-utilities

2010-03-19 Thread Sergey Beryozkin
Hi I need to update a JAXRS JAXBElementProvider to create attachment marshallers/unmarshallers for a xop packaging format be supported. cxf-rt-databinding-jaxb/org.apache.cxf.jaxb.attachment has all the classes I need but I'm not sure I should add a strong dependency on cxf-rt-databinding-jaxb at

Re: [VOTE] Release CXF 2.2.7

2010-03-19 Thread Jeff Genender
+1 Jeff On Mar 18, 2010, at 6:21 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote: > > Once again, there have been a bunch of bug fixes and enhancements that > have been done compared to the 2.2.6 release. Over 55 JIRA issues > are resolved for 2.2.7. > > List of issues: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Releas

Re: Moving org.apache.cxf.jaxb.attachment from cxf-rt-databinding-jaxb to cxf-common-utilities

2010-03-19 Thread Sergey Beryozkin
Hmm...Those classes depend on the CXF Attachment class which lives in the api module built after the common-utilities. Moving it into rt/core, org.apache.cxf.attachment.jaxb, may not be the best idea. I'll probably just add copies to a rt/frontend/jaxrs, given that there won't be a need to override

Re: Google Summer of Code ideas.....

2010-03-19 Thread Adrian Trenaman
How about doing an integration with ZooKeeper that would allow web/rest service instances to automatically register their existence with a run-time registry: at run-time, clients could then mint a reference to any one of the backend services. This would start as a mechanism to provide true loca

Re: Javascript generation

2010-03-19 Thread Demetris
Nice - thanks Dan. Do you know of any plans for CXF to support WSDL 2.0 soon? So in the CXF design, the client requests a javascript script through a URL-based command and then that script is used for the invocation of the remote (REST) service. Is the script on the server side generated at

Re: Javascript generation

2010-03-19 Thread Benson Margulies
Uh, no. The generated Javascript talks SOAP, not REST. We don't have a generator for REST clients. On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 2:57 PM, Demetris wrote: > > Nice - thanks Dan. Do you know of any plans for CXF to support WSDL 2.0 > soon? > > So in the CXF design, the client requests a javascript scri

Re: Javascript generation

2010-03-19 Thread Daniel Kulp
On Friday 19 March 2010 2:57:49 pm Demetris wrote: > Nice - thanks Dan. Do you know of any plans for CXF to support WSDL 2.0 > soon? > > So in the CXF design, the client requests a javascript script through a > URL-based > command and then that script is used for the invocation of the remote > (RE

Re: Javascript generation

2010-03-19 Thread Daniel Kulp
On Friday 19 March 2010 2:57:49 pm Demetris wrote: > Nice - thanks Dan. Do you know of any plans for CXF to support WSDL 2.0 > soon? Forgot to answer this one Not really unless someone steps up to do it. Really not much demand and very poor interopability with it since few toolkits support