Hi Liu
thanks for that. So can you tell what I would be able to use to capture the JMS
headers when the server is replying to the client if I shouldn't use
"org.apache.cxf.jms.server.reply.headers"?
Actually when is "org.apache.cxf.jms.server.reply.headers" used?
Also is my assumption for the
Hi Eamonn,
Eamonn Dwyer wrote:
Hi Liu
thanks for that. So can you tell what I would be able to use to capture the JMS headers
when the server is replying to the client if I shouldn't use
"org.apache.cxf.jms.server.reply.headers"?
Actually when is "org.apache.cxf.jms.server.reply.headers" used
Christian,
Another thought I just had:
While you are looking into the samples and such, also think about which of
them (if any) may be usable as starting points for new maven archetypes.
Right now, we pretty much have a single java-first archetype. It would
definitely be good to fill tha
Hi Dan,
I have updated the Navigation page. I also cleaned up the index page so
it consistently shows the children of the first level pages.
Greetings
Christian
Daniel Kulp schrieb:
On Wed September 9 2009 11:09:46 am Christian Schneider wrote:
I propose to adapt the Wiki Navigation (T
On Fri September 11 2009 12:21:46 pm Christian Schneider wrote:
> Hi Dan,
>
> I have updated the Navigation page. I also cleaned up the index page so
> it consistently shows the children of the first level pages.
Cool. I re-exported the space and you should be able to see the results at:
http://
On Thu September 10 2009 5:32:46 pm Tom Cassimon wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The annotation @XmlElement(required=true) seems to fix it, the Id field is
> now setted using the setter. Strange, I can't check it out further right
> now. Any idea why this could solve the problem? Does JAXB see it as an
> optiona
Hi there,
I'm seeing the JMSConduitTest.testJMSMessageMarshal() fail
regularly when run with the ibm jdk 5. It seems that for
some reason the JMSConduit is finalized in the midst of the
jmsTemplate.execute() call in that test. This closes the
connection and the test gets an error like this:
"
Hi Peter,
that is really strange. I also have no idea why the conduit is finalized.
You should write a good comment in front of the assert to avoid that
someone will later remove it again because he thinks it is unnecessary.
Greetings
Christian
Peter Jones schrieb:
Hi there,
I'm seeing t
Hi Christian,
For sure, will do.
Cheers,
Peter
Peter Jones
Progress Software
570 Newfoundland Drive
St. John's, NL, Canada A1A 5B1
Tel: +1 (709) 738-3725 ext 321
Internal wiki: http://wiki.progress.com/display/PRODENG/Home
-Original Message---