Re: SOAP/TCP server-side

2009-08-03 Thread Daniel Kulp
On Sun August 2 2009 10:12:36 am Krzysztof Wilkos wrote: > 2009/7/27 Daniel Kulp : > We didn't decided which MINA version we will use. 2.x branch has new > features and performance improvements but still there are no stable > realease. There are API differences between 1.x and 2.x branch so if > we

Re: [VOTE] Release CXF 2.0.12

2009-08-03 Thread Daniel Kulp
We have 8 (7 binding) +1 votes and no other votes. +1: dkulp, asoldano, jgenender, sberyozkin, ningjiang, eglynn, seanoc, ffang, This vote passes. I'll get the artifacts promoted. Dan On Wed July 29 2009 1:36:27 pm Daniel Kulp wrote: > This is a vote to release CXF 2.0.12 > > Once again,

Re: [VOTE] Release CXF 2.1.6

2009-08-03 Thread Daniel Kulp
We have 9 (8 binding) +1 votes and no other votes. +1: dkulp, asoldano, jgenender, sberyozkin, ningjiang, eglynn, seanoc, ffang, jimma This vote passes. I'll get the artifacts promoted. Dan On Wed July 29 2009 1:54:05 pm Daniel Kulp wrote: > This is a vote to release CXF 2.1.6 > > Once a

Re: [VOTE] Release CXF 2.2.3

2009-08-03 Thread Daniel Kulp
We have 8 (7 binding) +1 votes and no other votes. +1: dkulp, asoldano, jgenender, sberyozkin, ningjiang, eglynn, seanoc, ffang, This vote passes. I'll get the artifacts promoted. Dan On Wed July 29 2009 1:56:28 pm Daniel Kulp wrote: > his is a vote to release CXF 2.2.3 > > Once again, ther

Re: How To used SOAPMessage at ~Impl of CXF

2009-08-03 Thread Daniel Kulp
Honestly, I'm not sure you can. Under most circumstances in CXF, we don't ever create the SAAJ based SOAPMessage. Thus, it would never be available. If you add in the SAAJInInterceptor, we would create it, but that's not really exposed to the context that the endpoint would get. Two way