Thanks Benson :-)
- Original Message -
From:
To:
Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2009 1:31 AM
Subject: svn commit: r785866 - in /cxf/trunk/rt/frontend/jaxrs/src:
main/java/org/apache/cxf/jaxrs/provider/AbstractAegisProvider.java test/java/org/apache/cxf/jaxrs/provider/AegisProviderTest.java
Hi Richard, further comments in-line ...
> IMHO WS-RM 1.1 is the right way to do WS-RM, because this spec.
> addresses unacknowledged anonymous messages use case (see
WS-MakeConnection)
> This usecase wasn't addressed in WS-RM 1.0 and so I consider
> this old RM spec. broken.
Absolutely, the Mak
cc: d...@cxf as they are good questions that others might have
On Thu June 18 2009 4:49:39 am Alessio Soldano wrote:
> Hi Dan,
> I've few questions regarding the commitership and the way the project
> contribution is organized:
> - should I get an email when my account is properly set? I've j
Let me put in a plug for feeding the fish ... EYE. Be sure, when
writing commit comments, to put JIRA numbers into them, so that
FISH-EYE will automatically annotate JIRA.
Which suggests an opportunity to state a few other general principles,
which I will explain by telling a story.
You run into
Thanks Dan, what you say perfectly makes sense for me.
Benson, +1 on putting references to jira of course... and yes, I'm a fisheye
fan too, can't live, ehm, work without it ;-)
Cheers
Alessio
On Wed June 17 2009 9:11:03 pm rajla wrote:
> Sorry Dan, sometimes I am a a really loser.you are 100% right, the
> guilty party was old AXIS stuff server side. After that, I pushed the SAAJ
> stuff into the stupid endorsed directory (who came up with that brilliant
> idea anyway it is like
