Folks,
I'm calling a second vote to release CXF Distributed OSGi 1.0.
The main differences between this and the first take are:
- addition of a sources distro
- LICENSE file now contains references to licenses for 3rd party dependencies
- removal of extraneous NOTICEs
- addition of top-l
Eoghan,
Could the version be passed into the xslt via an xslt param? That would
avoid needing to modify it as part of the builds and such.
Dan
On Thu May 7 2009 10:04:10 am egl...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: eglynn
> Date: Thu May 7 14:04:09 2009
> New Revision: 772651
>
> URL: http://svn.
+1
David
2009/5/7 Eoghan Glynn :
> Folks,
>
> I'm calling a second vote to release CXF Distributed OSGi 1.0.
>
> The main differences between this and the first take are:
>
> - addition of a sources distro
> - LICENSE file now contains references to licenses for 3rd party dependencies
> - remo
2009/5/7 Daniel Kulp :
>
> Eoghan,
>
> Could the version be passed into the xslt via an xslt param? That would
> avoid needing to modify it as part of the builds and such.
>
> Dan
Yeah, sure it could.
The literal version in the xslt was just a quick'n'dirty fix for a
minor issue in the OSGi co
2009/5/7 Eoghan Glynn :
> 2009/5/7 Daniel Kulp :
>>
>> Eoghan,
>>
>> Could the version be passed into the xslt via an xslt param? That would
>> avoid needing to modify it as part of the builds and such.
>>
>> Dan
>
>
> Yeah, sure it could.
>
> The literal version in the xslt was just a quick'n'di
+1
- Original Message -
From: "Eoghan Glynn"
To:
Sent: Thursday, May 07, 2009 3:01 PM
Subject: [VOTE] Release CXF dOSGi 1.0 (take 2)
Folks,
I'm calling a second vote to release CXF Distributed OSGi 1.0.
The main differences between this and the first take are:
- addition of a so
Hi Dan,
Long story short, I got this working yesterday.
This concept of Local Transport in CXF is very useful for custom transports.
I think there should be more documentation on how to use this.
I also think that Interceptors is another very useful thing for customizing,
more documentation wou
