Application Layer Session Management for WS

2009-02-06 Thread anoopPrasad
Dear All, I have Integrated the latest CXF 2.1.3 with my system and it started working without making much noise (Some noise near the JMS area ;-) ;change in the way we were configuring it) We do have a need to maintain session for certain Web Services for licensing the same for certain Service

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CXF 2.1.4 (Take 2)

2009-02-06 Thread Sergey Beryozkin
+ 1 On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 3:27 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote: (The issue with the J2EE has been corrected. This is a new vote on the new artifacts) This is a vote to release CXF 2.1.4 With a longer than normal cycle, a LOT of stuff is in this. Over 88 JIRA issues are resolved for 2.1.3 which

Re: [VOTE] Release CXF 2.0.10 (Take 2)

2009-02-06 Thread Willem Jiang
+1 Willem Daniel Kulp wrote: > (The issue with the J2EE has been corrected. This is a new vote on the new > artifacts) > > > Since it's been about 4 months since the 2.0.9 release, I decided to go ahead > and do a 2.0.10 release along with 2.1.4. > > This is a vote to release CXF 2.0.10 >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CXF 2.1.4 (Take 2)

2009-02-06 Thread Willem Jiang
+1 Willem Daniel Kulp wrote: > (The issue with the J2EE has been corrected. This is a new vote on the new > artifacts) > > > This is a vote to release CXF 2.1.4 > > With a longer than normal cycle, a LOT of stuff is in this. Over 88 JIRA > issues are resolved for 2.1.3 which is quite a b

Re: [VOTE] Release CXF 2.0.10 (Take 2)

2009-02-06 Thread Freeman Fang
+1 Freeman Daniel Kulp wrote: (The issue with the J2EE has been corrected. This is a new vote on the new artifacts) Since it's been about 4 months since the 2.0.9 release, I decided to go ahead and do a 2.0.10 release along with 2.1.4. This is a vote to release CXF 2.0.10 Once again, the

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CXF 2.1.4 (Take 2)

2009-02-06 Thread davidb
+1 David Bosschaert

RE: [VOTE] Release Apache CXF 2.1.4 (Take 2)

2009-02-06 Thread Eoghan Glynn
+1

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CXF 2.1.4 (Take 2)

2009-02-06 Thread Jeff Genender
+1 On Feb 6, 2009, at 3:22 AM, Sergey Beryozkin wrote: + 1 On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 3:27 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote: (The issue with the J2EE has been corrected. This is a new vote on the new artifacts) This is a vote to release CXF 2.1.4 With a longer than normal cycle, a LOT of stuff is

Re: [VOTE] Release CXF 2.0.10 (Take 2)

2009-02-06 Thread Jeff Genender
+1 On Feb 6, 2009, at 3:24 AM, Sergey Beryozkin wrote: +1 On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 3:27 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote: (The issue with the J2EE has been corrected. This is a new vote on the new artifacts) Since it's been about 4 months since the 2.0.9 release, I decided to go ahead and do a

Re: [VOTE] Release CXF 2.0.10 (Take 2)

2009-02-06 Thread Sergey Beryozkin
+1 On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 3:27 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote: (The issue with the J2EE has been corrected. This is a new vote on the new artifacts) Since it's been about 4 months since the 2.0.9 release, I decided to go ahead and do a 2.0.10 release along with 2.1.4. This is a vote to release C

Re: [VOTE] Release CXF 2.0.10 (Take 2)

2009-02-06 Thread davidb
+1 David Bosschaert

RE: [VOTE] Release CXF 2.0.10 (Take 2)

2009-02-06 Thread Sean O'Callaghan
+1 -Original Message- From: Daniel Kulp [mailto:dk...@apache.org] Sent: 05 February 2009 20:27 To: dev@cxf.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] Release CXF 2.0.10 (Take 2) (The issue with the J2EE has been corrected. This is a new vote on the new artifacts) Since it's been about 4 months si

RE: [VOTE] Release Apache CXF 2.1.4 (Take 2)

2009-02-06 Thread Sean O'Callaghan
+1 -Original Message- From: Daniel Kulp [mailto:dk...@apache.org] Sent: 05 February 2009 20:28 To: dev@cxf.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache CXF 2.1.4 (Take 2) (The issue with the J2EE has been corrected. This is a new vote on the new artifacts) This is a vote to release C

RE: [VOTE] Release CXF 2.0.10 (Take 2)

2009-02-06 Thread Eoghan Glynn
+1

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CXF 2.1.4 (Take 2)

2009-02-06 Thread Freeman Fang
+1 Freeman Daniel Kulp wrote: (The issue with the J2EE has been corrected. This is a new vote on the new artifacts) This is a vote to release CXF 2.1.4 With a longer than normal cycle, a LOT of stuff is in this. Over 88 JIRA issues are resolved for 2.1.3 which is quite a bit of work.

Re: Any examples of CXF interop with WCF using WS-Security?

2009-02-06 Thread Magnus Larsson
Hello again! I gave the wssec11 - client a try but got into trouble that you might be able to help me sort out: I checkedout CXF from trunk and built it with: mvn -Pfastinstall source:jar clean install Then I checked out the interopfest folder and built it with: mvn install Finally I downl

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CXF 2.1.4 (Take 2)

2009-02-06 Thread Christian Schneider
+1 Daniel Kulp schrieb: (The issue with the J2EE has been corrected. This is a new vote on the new artifacts) This is a vote to release CXF 2.1.4 With a longer than normal cycle, a LOT of stuff is in this. Over 88 JIRA issues are resolved for 2.1.3 which is quite a bit of work. List

Re: [VOTE] Release CXF 2.0.10 (Take 2)

2009-02-06 Thread Christian Schneider
+1 Daniel Kulp schrieb: (The issue with the J2EE has been corrected. This is a new vote on the new artifacts) Since it's been about 4 months since the 2.0.9 release, I decided to go ahead and do a 2.0.10 release along with 2.1.4. This is a vote to release CXF 2.0.10 Once again, there hav

Re: [VOTE] Release CXF 2.0.10 (Take 2)

2009-02-06 Thread Ulhas Bhole
+1 -- Ulhas Daniel Kulp wrote: (The issue with the J2EE has been corrected. This is a new vote on the new artifacts) Since it's been about 4 months since the 2.0.9 release, I decided to go ahead and do a 2.0.10 release along with 2.1.4. This is a vote to release CXF 2.0.10 Once again, t

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CXF 2.1.4 (Take 2)

2009-02-06 Thread Ulhas Bhole
+1 --Ulhas Daniel Kulp wrote: (The issue with the J2EE has been corrected. This is a new vote on the new artifacts) This is a vote to release CXF 2.1.4 With a longer than normal cycle, a LOT of stuff is in this. Over 88 JIRA issues are resolved for 2.1.3 which is quite a bit of work.