Many thanks all for the support!
Dan, what are the steps I should be taking next?
Best regards,
David
2008/11/16 Eoghan Glynn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Well I think we can safely declare a result here having received 14
> endorsements (of which 12 were binding PMC-member votes), and no dissentin
Fellow CXF committers and interested parties:
I am now a committer on XmlSchema. I've applied all the patches that
were lying around, and I'm trying to fix some issues for which Dan
Kulp has documented problems and not solutions. I plan to learn the
release process and push out a 1.4.3 soon.
If t
Glen or Dan, could you please look at this and see if it is a legit complaint?
On Monday 17 November 2008 4:29:49 am David Bosschaert wrote:
> Many thanks all for the support!
> Dan, what are the steps I should be taking next?
The first step is to get an icla filed. You need to fill out and send in:
http://www.apache.org/licenses/icla.txt
once that is filed and processed, I
On Sunday 16 November 2008 3:29:13 pm Benson Margulies wrote:
> WSCOMMONS-362 notes that NodeList is inherently non-thread-safe.
> XmlSchema exposes a few APIs that accept and return NodeList's of
> markup content for AppInfo and Documentation. Would anyone object to
> changing those, incompatibly,
The only thing I'd really LIKE to do is to try and get the type tests passing
if we turn off the DOM schema cache. One reason we keep the DOM around for
the schema is due to XmlSchema losing stuff and thus the type tests fail with
various validation issues. Just about every XmlSchema releas
On Friday 14 November 2008 5:05:27 pm William Tam wrote:
> The org.apache.cxf.jaxws.JaxWsClientFactoryBean does not seem to
> support setting jaxws handlers. Is it something can be added or is it
> omitted for a reason?
Hmm it probably would make sense to push that and the Holder/Attachement
(Dan: I spoke too soon about having everything work).
Here we have a message.
Payload: http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/";>http://apache.org/schema_validation/types";>Hello
Validation fails, claiming that it doesn't know a definition for
getComplexStruct.
I dumped the XML derived from X
