Hi Eoghan,
Yes, the patch contained fairly complex moves of a number of XML files,
which involved moving them to new directories etc.
To get around the problem, I have created a new patch that was created
without using moves (I simply copied the file and deleted the original).
This causes so
Thanks David, patch is applied.
/Eoghan
David Bosschaert wrote:
Hi Eoghan,
Yes, the patch contained fairly complex moves of a number of XML files,
which involved moving them to new directories etc.
To get around the problem, I have created a new patch that was created
without using moves
Hi all,
I've attached a patch to https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-1854
which contains the beginning of a distribution of the DOSGi stuff. The
distribution contains all the required dependencies (OSGi bundles) is
built as part of the maven build in distribution/multi-bundle/target
Wo
Hi,
I have a use case where I need to use the JAX-WS Dispatch Instance with a
custom data binding not the SourceDataBinding that get used for the
Dispatch
createDispatch
(..., java.lang.Class type, ...) call in org.apache.cxf.jaxws.ServiceImpl.
Is it possbile to configure this via cxf
On Oct 8, 2008, at 5:16 PM, Sergey Beryozkin wrote:
Hi
I agree with what Dan suggested - logging a message in a
PolicyVerificationOutInterceptor should suffice in most cases. Few
more
comments.
I think that asserting a policy on the outbound path makes sense
only if
a specification for a
Thanks David, patch applied.
David Bosschaert wrote:
Hi all,
I've attached a patch to https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-1854
which contains the beginning of a distribution of the DOSGi stuff. The
distribution contains all the required dependencies (OSGi bundles) is
built as part of
Doh! That was supposed to be [{foo:Bar}, {bling}Blang]
On Oct 9, 2008, at 9:44 AM, Fred Dushin wrote:
And on the outbound side you'd get [{foo:Bar}, {gnu}Gnat]
Hi Dan,
I got a java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError:
org/apache/xml/serializer/TreeWalker when I try to build the sample in
the latest CXF 2.0.9 SNAPSHOT.
It looks like current CXF 2.0.9-SNAPSHOT shipped xalan-2.7.1.jar don't
have the org.apache.xml.serializer package.
Can you help me to verify i
Does the java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError:
org/apache/xml/serializer/TreeWalker relates to change of updating to
using xalan 2.7.1 ?
Daniel Kulp wrote:
Willem,
Thanks for volunteering to do this. That's great.
I think it would be good to do 2.0.9 late this week and probably 2.1.3
middle o
On Thursday 09 October 2008 10:13:08 am Willem Jiang wrote:
> Does the java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError:
> org/apache/xml/serializer/TreeWalker relates to change of updating to
> using xalan 2.7.1 ?
Yea. Where are you seeing that?
There is a new jar (serializer.jar) in lib that contains that c
I can't find the serializer.jar in 2.0.9 SNAPSHOT, but I found it in
2.1.3 SNAPSHOT.
After went through the commit log , I found there is one different between
rt/ws/security/pom.xml in 2.0.x and 2.1.x ,
the xalan's dependency scope is runtime in 2.0.x, and uses the default compile
scope in 2
Hi
Suppose you have this config:
Does apply to the inbound our outbound path? Or both? What are the
semantics here?
This coarse-graned policy applies to an endpoint so as I said it's up to the implementation as to whether it will affect
in/out/both pathes. As far as the poli
Hi Dan,
-@SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
public ManagedConnection matchManagedConnections(Set mcs, Subject subject,
ConnectionRequestInfo reqInfo) throws ResourceException {
Without the @SuppressWarnings, my Eclipse IDE flags me a warning loud
and clear. (I do mvn -Psetup.ecl
Interesting. I removed it because my eclipse IDE gave me a warning saying it
was unneeded.Strange. Not sure what that would occur. Hmm
Dan
On Thursday 09 October 2008 11:24:32 am William Tam wrote:
> Hi Dan,
>
>
> -@SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
> public ManagedConnection
On Oct 9, 2008, at 10:38 AM, Sergey Beryozkin wrote:
Does apply to the inbound our outbound path? Or both?
What are the semantics here?
This coarse-graned policy applies to an endpoint so as I said it's
up to the implementation as to whether it will affect in/
out/both pathes.
Tha
Hi,
I would like to ask for some guidance on using CXF together with Spring, more
specifically in terms of lifecycle management. There seems to be two ways how
CXF can be integrated with Spring:
1) It can be embedded in Spring as outlined in
http://cwiki.apache.org/CXF20DOC/deploymentspring.ht
Hi Fred
I strat thinking this message gets a bit off-track :-) Few more comments.
That's fine, in that the AssertionBuilder can render a decision about what interceptors to add to the chain. But that won't
solve the bug I've identified.
As we've said many times what will solve this probl
On Thursday 09 October 2008 11:49:28 am Orban, Gyorgy (IT) wrote:
> 1) It can be embedded in Spring as outlined in
> http://cwiki.apache.org/CXF20DOC/deploymentspring.html. In this case, the
> user's application context imports the cxf spring configuration and the CXF
> runtime will be in the s
On Wednesday 08 October 2008 7:17:59 pm Christian Schneider wrote:
> I would propose to add the following to UncheckedException and
> corresponding "super" calls to all exceptions.
>
> public UncheckedException(String code, ResourceBundle bundle,
> Object...params) {
> this(new Message(
I'm not sure what to say about this one. Neither CXF or the RI are "wrong"
here, they are both completely correct per the specifications.
Putting the "name" there is definitely OK per JAX-WS spec and I definitely
prefer keeping it there as certain tools sometimes have issues mapping things
Hi,
I'd like to try to summarize what we've talked at this thread. Fred - please
feel free to challenge what I'm about to say :-)
Original problem : server-side outbound Policy interceptor assumes that no
policy alternative has been asserted on the outbound path and reports a
failure by (mistaken
There are an error on page:
http://cwiki.apache.org/CXF20DOC/jax-rs-jsr-311.html
the code:
Should be:
I tried to fix by myself, bu I don't have permission for that.
Regards,
Ricardo
--
Ricardo Paiva
Java & Flex Developer - RHCE
Rio de Janeiro - Brazil
we
Yeah, I think this summarizes it well.
On Oct 9, 2008, at 5:10 PM, Sergey Beryozkin wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to try to summarize what we've talked at this thread. Fred
- please
feel free to challenge what I'm about to say :-)
Original problem : server-side outbound Policy interceptor assumes
hi all,
I try build WS with apache cxf + Sring + Hibernate, but get some error when
implementation with hibernate.
1. Without Hibernate
my [appContext.xml]
http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans";
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance";
xmlns:context="http://www.s
The version of you are using asm jars (with org.objectweb.asm.ClassVisitor)
is not match with current spring ,try a newer.
Good luck!
2008/10/10 Saiful Haqqi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> hi all,
>
> I try build WS with apache cxf + Sring + Hibernate, but get some error when
> implementation with hib
> The version of you are using asm jars (with org.objectweb.asm.ClassVisitor)
> is not match with current spring ,try a newer.
>
> Good luck!
In my wat file containt with more than one asm jar file
1. asm <--- hibernate
2. asm-2.2.3 <-- apache cxf
3. asm-all-3.1 <--- my own add
4. asm-attrs <---
Saiful Haqqi wrote:
>
>> The version of you are using asm jars (with
>> org.objectweb.asm.ClassVisitor)
>> is not match with current spring ,try a newer.
>>
>> Good luck!
>
> I am just use asm-all and cglib-nodep now and does't get any exception
> when deploying spring application.
>
> But I
Please use the CXF shipped asm for CXF, and use the cglib-nodep for
hibernate.
Willem
Saiful Haqqi wrote:
The version of you are using asm jars (with org.objectweb.asm.ClassVisitor)
is not match with current spring ,try a newer.
Good luck!
In my wat file containt with more than one as
28 matches
Mail list logo
