Christian has been doing quite a bit of very good work doing an almost "ground
up" re-write of the JMS transport which is a very challenging and complicated
task.
He's done quite a bit of work documenting various JMS things on the Wiki and
even wrote an article about how to integrate the Camel
+1
/Eoghan
Daniel Kulp wrote:
Christian has been doing quite a bit of very good work doing an almost "ground
up" re-write of the JMS transport which is a very challenging and complicated
task.
He's done quite a bit of work documenting various JMS things on the Wiki and
even wrote an article
+1
Ajay
> -Original Message-
> From: Daniel Kulp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 19 September 2008 14:29
> To: dev@cxf.apache.org
> Subject: [VOTE] Christian Schneider for committer
>
>
> Christian has been doing quite a bit of very good work doing
> an almost "ground up" re-write
+1
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 9:28 AM, Daniel Kulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Christian has been doing quite a bit of very good work doing an almost "ground
> up" re-write of the JMS transport which is a very challenging and complicated
> task.
>
> He's done quite a bit of work documenting variou
+1
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Kulp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 19 September 2008 14:29
To: dev@cxf.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Christian Schneider for committer
Christian has been doing quite a bit of very good work doing an almost "ground
up" re-write of the JMS transport whic
Here is my +1.
Willem
Daniel Kulp wrote:
Christian has been doing quite a bit of very good work doing an almost "ground
up" re-write of the JMS transport which is a very challenging and complicated
task.
He's done quite a bit of work documenting various JMS things on the Wiki and
even wrote
+1
On Sep 19, 2008, at 7:28 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
Christian has been doing quite a bit of very good work doing an
almost "ground
up" re-write of the JMS transport which is a very challenging and
complicated
task.
He's done quite a bit of work documenting various JMS things on the
Wiki
+1
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 3:51 PM, Jeff Genender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> +1
>
>
> On Sep 19, 2008, at 7:28 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
>
>
>> Christian has been doing quite a bit of very good work doing an almost
>> "ground
>> up" re-write of the JMS transport which is a very challenging and
>> c
+1
-- Ulhas
Daniel Kulp wrote:
Christian has been doing quite a bit of very good work doing an almost "ground
up" re-write of the JMS transport which is a very challenging and complicated
task.
He's done quite a bit of work documenting various JMS things on the Wiki and
even wrote an article
+1
- Original Message -
From: "Daniel Kulp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, September 19, 2008 2:28 PM
Subject: [VOTE] Christian Schneider for committer
Christian has been doing quite a bit of very good work doing an almost "ground
up" re-write of the JMS transport which is
I would like to know 2 things:
1. I would like to know if you can control the namespace in the
generated-wsdl to what you want ? Right now the target namespace reflects
the package name (in an inverted manner) of the class exposed with
@WebService.
I would like to control the target namespace mys
+1
Cheers,
Peter
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 09:28:30AM -0400, Daniel Kulp wrote:
>
> Christian has been doing quite a bit of very good work doing an almost
> "ground
> up" re-write of the JMS transport which is a very challenging and complicated
> task.
>
> He's done quite a bit of work docume
On Friday 19 September 2008 2:32:32 pm kasturi1010 wrote:
> I would like to know 2 things:
>
> 1. I would like to know if you can control the namespace in the
> generated-wsdl to what you want ? Right now the target namespace reflects
> the package name (in an inverted manner) of the class exposed
dkulp wrote:
>
> [X] +1
> [ ] -1
>
Glen
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/-VOTE--Christian-Schneider-for-committer-tp19572379p19581754.html
Sent from the cxf-dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
14 matches
Mail list logo
