Re: Aegis versus jaxrs

2008-08-01 Thread Sergey Beryozkin
Hi When a CXF service offers JAX-RS, some CXF-specific configuration is involved, no? So, could we not have some properties at the service level which the ProviderFactory consumes-if-provided? Aegis in particular has a set of configuration options, it would be very cumbersome to force those to b

Re: Aegis versus jaxrs

2008-08-01 Thread Benson Margulies
I think I'm beginning to get the idea of what I'm trying to complain about. An AegisDatabinding object has input configuration and it has state. As it goes along, it constructs mappings for types. I'm having trouble swallowing a situation in which each individual JAX-RS item does this independent

Re: [QUESTION OF TASTE] Should an Aegis(Xml)ServiceConfiguration demand the presence of an AegisDatabinding?

2008-08-01 Thread Daniel Kulp
On Jul 31, 2008, at 1:51 PM, Benson Margulies wrote: Proposal: The service configuration will obtain the data binding from the service factory. If it is Aegis, it will extract the desired customizations. If it is not Aegis, it will do nothing. It will NOT independently pull in and parse the X

Re: Support for JiBX

2008-08-01 Thread Daniel Kulp
On Jul 29, 2008, at 6:07 PM, Rao, Sameer V wrote: Hi, Wanted to check when is the JiBX support planned for release. Also, is it possible for users to user a message binding (work with the xml stream) and internally use JiBX (a stop-gap arrangement until jibx is natively support for webservice