Folks,
Does anyone know if svnmerge.py can be used to report on the commits to
trunk that have been "blocked" wrt to merging out to the 2.0.x_fixes branch?
Its sortta like a retrospective "avail" option that I'm after, i.e.
gimme all the commits that were available for merging, but were sele
Hi Eoghan,
I guess what you want is "svnmerge.py avail -B", which will showthe
blocked revision list.
Regards
Freeman
Eoghan Glynn wrote:
Folks,
Does anyone know if svnmerge.py can be used to report on the commits
to trunk that have been "blocked" wrt to merging out to the
2.0.x_fixes b
It's all stored as properties on the directory. Thus:
svn propget svnmerge-blocked .
would give you the list of revisions. THAT said, the stuff gnodet,
Freeman, and Willem have merged without using svnmerge.py may appear
in that list.
On a related note: I'm not using subversion 1.5
Thanks Dan & Freeman,
Both suggested methods give exactly the same results.
A total of well over blocked 500 commits ... ouch, that's a lot to go
thru manually.
BTW what's general feeling on the completeness of the 2.1 Migration
Guide[1] wrt capturing potential compatibility issues?
Cheer
Hello all
I apologise for cross posting, but I was not getting much traction in
the users-list and I do think that my question is worth asking and
answering. Here is what I have so far:
Hello Daniel
I had another profiling session and this time saved the snapshot so we
ca
David, the very same developers are on both lists. Best to follow up on the
User's list to keep the archives clean for future searching.
Glen
David Soroko wrote:
>
> Hello all
>
>
>
> I apologise for cross posting, but I was not getting much traction in
> the users-list and I do think tha
I was wondering the same thing about the migration guide
-Original Message-
From: Eoghan Glynn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2008 10:10 AM
To: dev@cxf.apache.org
Subject: Re: Tracking trunk commits blocked wrt to the 2.0.x_fixes
branch
Thanks Dan & Freeman,
Bo
On Jul 17, 2008, at 10:10 AM, David Soroko wrote:
Hello all
I apologise for cross posting, but I was not getting much traction in
the users-list and I do think that my question is worth asking and
answering.
Doesn't really matter, although I do disagree with Glen on this. This
really is a "
dkulp wrote:
>
>
> On Jul 17, 2008, at 10:10 AM, David Soroko wrote:
>> Hello all
>> I apologise for cross posting, but I was not getting much traction in
>> the users-list and I do think that my question is worth asking and
>> answering.
>
> Doesn't really matter, although I do disagree with
For the most part, the migration guide covers everything that I've
seen people comment on in the forums. That's not saying it's 100%
complete, but it's probably a good start. Feel free to add to it as
you audit the commits. :-)
Dan
On Jul 17, 2008, at 10:22 AM, Johnson, Eric wrote
Oh I see--I think you already merged the WSS4JInInterceptor one in
2.0.x, it's just the WSS4JOutInterceptor we're talking about. I'm OK
either way about changing the code because regardless, I think I can
rephrase the CXF documentation anyway and make that SAAJInterceptor
notice somewhat more mino
11 matches
Mail list logo
