Re: [VOTE] Release CXF 2.0.7

2008-06-18 Thread Guillaume Nodet
+1 On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 4:44 PM, Daniel Kulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > > > This is a vote to release CXF 2.0.7 > > Once again, there have been a bunch of bug fixes and enhancements that > have been done compared to the 2.0.7 release. Over

RE: [VOTE] Release CXF 2.1.1

2008-06-18 Thread Pawel Lipka
+1 -- Pawel Lipka IT Architect AMG.net businesstechnology consulting http://www.amg.net.pl Łąkowa 11, 90-554 Lodz, tel/fax (42) 296 11 32 Tresc niniejszej wiadomosci moze byc poufna. Jezeli nie jestescie Panstwo jej adresatem, to rozprowadzanie lub wy

Ideas for 2.2

2008-06-18 Thread Daniel Kulp
Now that 2.1.1 is being voted on, I'd like to step back a bit and talk a little about ideas for the next versions. First, most likely, we'll need to do a 2.1.2 release in about 6-8 weeks (and maybe 2.0.8 as well). We've done a very good job of getting fixes out to our users in a timely

Re: [VOTE] Release CXF 2.0.7

2008-06-18 Thread Guillaume Sauthier
+1 2.0.7 fix the bug CXF-1642 :) --G Daniel Kulp wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 This is a vote to release CXF 2.0.7 Once again, there have been a bunch of bug fixes and enhancements that have been done compared to the 2.0.7 release. Over 48 JIRA issues are resolved

Re: Ideas for 2.2

2008-06-18 Thread Eric Johnson
I like the idea of custom annotations for making the Java-first stuff work better. On Wed, 2008-06-18 at 11:17 -0400, Daniel Kulp wrote: > Now that 2.1.1 is being voted on, I'd like to step back a bit and talk > a little about ideas for the next versions. > > First, most likely, we'll need to

Re: Ideas for 2.2

2008-06-18 Thread Eoghan Glynn
Daniel Kulp wrote: 5) OSGi stuff - I know there are some OSGi enhancements in the works that could be pulled in: a) osgi http transport - this currently lives in ServiceMix, but could be pulled into CXF to work with other OSGi runtimes b) Distributed OSGi (RFC 119) - there is work being

Re: Ideas for 2.2

2008-06-18 Thread Christian Schneider
I would really like to see good osgi integration as we plan to rely quite heavily on osgi in the future. But as I myself are only starting on this I don´t know much about the details. Basically I would like to be able to connect the osgi internal services with cxf to communicate with the outsi

Re: Ideas for 2.2

2008-06-18 Thread Glen Mazza
I think our WSS4J interceptors really need to support "nonces"--IIRC according to WS-Security w/UsernameToken profile web service calls aren't really secure if those aren't included with the username, password, and timestamp. I am still not sure if WSS4J supports the SAML Token Profile, but that wo

Re: Ideas for 2.2

2008-06-18 Thread Eoghan Glynn
Christian Schneider wrote: I would really like to see good osgi integration as we plan to rely quite heavily on osgi in the future. But as I myself are only starting on this I don´t know much about the details. Basically I would like to be able to connect the osgi internal services with cxf t