I'm more likely to remember to add this wrinkle if you reopen the JIRA :-)
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 9:59 AM, Daniel Kulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Most likely, in those cases, we would be calling writeDocument with the
> writePrologue falg set to false as it would be encapsulated in a soap
> m
Most likely, in those cases, we would be calling writeDocument with
the writePrologue falg set to false as it would be encapsulated in a
soap message or something that would have already written that.
Most likely, if prologue writing is turned off, we DON'T want to write
any PI's eithe
> Have fun. But I don't think PI's are part of the WSDL document--they are
> external to it, however I'm seeing some open source products that provide
> stylesheets for WSDLs, so it may not be that big a deal.
>
> At any rate, make sure your change does not result in SOAP messages being
> allowed
x27;s--that remains a no-no (3rd paragraph of
http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/REC-soap12-part1-20030624/#soapenv, and also the
WS-I Basic Profile).
Glen
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/how-about-we-honor-style-sheet-in-wsdl-tp18604911p18642205.html
Sent from the cxf-dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
I don't see it being our job to remove things from a WSDL file. Who
knows what protocol someone might be inventing with PIs? Style sheets
are just another PI.
I'm going to go ahead and make a fix.
Hi Glen,
Actually I have same concern with you.
This request is from a servicemix user but I'm not sure if it's
reasonable for wsdl, so I post question here to get more feedback.
Regards
Freeman
Glen Mazza wrote:
Should WSDLs have stylesheets? After all, as they say, web services are for
they
> can also see the stylesheet their.
> Or any reason we shouldn't do it?
>
> Thanks
> Freeman
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/how-about-we-honor-style-sheet-in-wsdl-tp18604911p18625095.html
Sent from the cxf-dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On Jul 23, 2008, at 8:21 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
I think the problem is that when served from CXF, the PI is removed
from the original WSDL.
Does wsdl4j keep the PI?That's the first question.
Actually, just looked in StaxUtils and it wouldn't write the PI:
public static void w
Oh! Is there a JIRA for this? It has to be a side-effect of patching
the address, no?
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 8:21 AM, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think the problem is that when served from CXF, the PI is removed
> from the original WSDL.
>
> On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 2:05 PM, Ben
I think the problem is that when served from CXF, the PI is removed
from the original WSDL.
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 2:05 PM, Benson Margulies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't follow exactly.
>
> If the URL in the PI were relative, then we could imagine serving it
> up. But as an absolute URL,
I don't follow exactly.
If the URL in the PI were relative, then we could imagine serving it
up. But as an absolute URL, it's up to the user to configure the
container to deliver it, no?
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 2:48 AM, Freeman Fang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> For the wsdl like
>
> h
Hi,
For the wsdl like
href="http://api.bioinfo.no/stylesheets/WSDLDocumentation.xslt";?>
http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/";
Is it possible that we publish stylesheet as well when we publish the
wsdl, I mean if customer get wsdl from http://serviceaddress?wsdl, they
can also see the styl
12 matches
Mail list logo
