n. If you are using JAX-RS, you definitely
>> want
>> the compliant implementation in 2.2.
>>
>> Anyway, making 2.1.9 the end of the line should then make it such that
>> when
>> 2.3 is ready (hopefully in Q1), we can just keep 2 fixes branches active.
>>
>>
Fine with me too.
Cheers
Alessio
Benson Margulies wrote:
I'm +1 for turning off 2.1 support.
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 10:05 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
Question for everyone.
What are peoples thoughts about making 2.1.9 (in January) the last of the
2.1.x line?
2.2.x will have been out for
Hi
Question for everyone.
What are peoples thoughts about making 2.1.9 (in January) the last of the
2.1.x line?
2.2.x will have been out for 10 months by then so users definitely should have
had plenty of time to migrate. 2.2.x is generally a simple migration from
2.1.x. I think m
I'm +1 for turning off 2.1 support.
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 10:05 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
>
> Question for everyone.
>
> What are peoples thoughts about making 2.1.9 (in January) the last of the
> 2.1.x line?
>
> 2.2.x will have been out for 10 months by then so users definitely should
> have
Question for everyone.
What are peoples thoughts about making 2.1.9 (in January) the last of the
2.1.x line?
2.2.x will have been out for 10 months by then so users definitely should have
had plenty of time to migrate. 2.2.x is generally a simple migration from
2.1.x. I think most of
