Just want to add that jibx for CXF will be very much handy for applications
in jdk 1.4 where in we cannot use jaxb annotations - Thanks
--
View this message in context:
http://cxf.547215.n5.nabble.com/CXF-and-JIBX-binding-tp3323278p4377924.html
Sent from the cxf-dev mailing list archive at Nabb
On 01/02/2011 08:44 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
> On Friday 31 December 2010 2:05:47 am Laurent Mignon wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I want use CXF in my own projects. Since I need some flexibility on how my
>> java objects are serialized to XML, the use of jibx for the binding is a
>> requirement.
>> What's
On Friday 31 December 2010 2:05:47 am Laurent Mignon wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I want use CXF in my own projects. Since I need some flexibility on how my
> java objects are serialized to XML, the use of jibx for the binding is a
> requirement.
> What's the status of the current GSoc proposal?
It's kind of
Are you sure you can't obtain similar needed customization with JAXB[1]
(or XMLBeans or Aegis)? With neither CXF nor Metro currently
implementing it, Jibx could not have much market share, so it is hard to
see how its use can be a "requirement".
Glen
[1] http://www.jroller.com/gmazza/entry/c
