Yes, that's precisely my idea. For the immediate case at hand, just mtom
would be useful. I see your point about the whole (oink) hog. Perhaps I can
get Tatu excited about the Woodstox end of this.
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 6:53 AM, Eoghan Glynn wrote:
> Hi Benson,
>
> Do you mean using an NIO Map
Hi Benson,
Do you mean using an NIO MappedByteBuffer?
That would be an interesting thing to look at doing.
Obviously limiting it to MTOM attachments sortta simplifies things,
but of course there's also the possibility to go the whole hog and
write a full-blown transport based on shared memory. N
