>
> Then fix the test. :-)
>
> Dan
>
>
> On Friday 10 December 2010 11:49:33 am dav...@apache.org wrote:
>> Author: davidb
>> Date: Fri Dec 10 16:49:33 2010
>> New Revision: 1044430
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1044430&view=rev
>&g
Hi Eoghan,
All I can say is that the system tests always work fine on my machine
and that they also work fine on Hudson...
http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/view/CXF/job/CXF-DOSGi/
Having said that, it's always a little tricky to get system tests
right for all machines as there are so many th
Hi Eoghan,
On 17 July 2010 12:59, Eoghan Glynn wrote:
>> Eoghan would you have some cycles?
>
> Yeah.
Excellent!
> A couple of things before I go ahead and cut the release:
>
> - can you update the release notes[1] with a summary of what's new in this
> release?
Done.
> - does this TimeoutExc
Sorry that should have said CXF 2.2.9.
The commit is good, the message has the typo.
Unfortunately no
svn commit --amend
yet...
David
On 16 July 2010 13:46, wrote:
> Author: davidb
> Date: Fri Jul 16 12:46:10 2010
> New Revision: 964787
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?
+1 from me too.
David
On 10 March 2010 14:29, Daniel Kulp wrote:
>
> David's been doing a good job lately of answering questions on the
> mailing lists and getting involved there. He's also submitted several high
> quality patches for the ws-security and security-policy stuff. The patches
> a
Thanks for the heads up Eoghan.
I understood that the recent tiny bundles integration could take care
of this. Have a look at the bottom example in
http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxexam/ExamAndTinybundles. Do you think
that will do it?
Cheers,
David
2010/1/22 Eoghan Glynn :
>
> David,
>
> One t
Hi all,
One of the things to-do for the DOSGi refactoring work that's
currently happening on trunk is to re-enable the system tests.
Now both Sergey and I have been fighting with the spring-osgi based
testing system that's there before and I can tell you it's generally
no fun at all. The biggest p
Ok - I'll take a look.
I can't just change it to 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT because these classes are
defined by the OSGi Alliance and their version is actually 1.0.0. But
maybe we can avoid building this module separately, this module is
only an internal artefact for DOSGi...
Cheers,
David
2009/12/18 Danie
Hi all,
The DOSGi deploy build on Hudson is failing with the following:
[INFO] Error deploying artifact: Authorization failed: Access denied
to:
https://repository.apache.org/service/local/staging/deploy/maven2/org/apache/cxf/dosgi/cxf-dosgi-remote-service-admin-interfaces/1.0.0/cxf-dosgi-remote
2009/12/17 Daniel Kulp :
> I've set it up:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DOSGI
Nice!
> On a related note, should we have a separate DOSGi space on the wiki as well
> like we do for the docs? It could then have it's own navigation bar,
> etc
>
> The top level page at cxf.apache.or
Yeah - I think its a good idea to put CXF DOSGi as a separate project in JIRA.
Thanks,
David
2009/12/17 Daniel Kulp :
>
> Is there any objections to moving the DOSGI stuff out to it's own JIRA? If
> not, I'll do so on Friday. Speak now... :-)
>
> Dan
>
>
> On Mon December 14 2009 2:39:17 pm
+1
David
2009/12/3 Daniel Kulp :
>
>
> Cyrille has submitted several patches to various management and logging
> related things for CXF starting way back in February. I think he's up to 7
> or 8 submitted patches. He's also been hanging around the user list for
> almost a year answering some
Big +1 from me!
David
2009/11/25 Eoghan Glynn :
> Folks,
>
> I'm calling a vote to release CXF Distributed OSGi 1.1.
>
> The dOSGi subproject of CXF provides the Reference Implementation of the
> Remote Services Specification version 1.0, Chapter 13 in the OSGi Compendium
> Specification [1].
>
>
+1
David
2009/11/15 Daniel Kulp :
>
> This is a vote to release CXF 2.2.5
>
> Once again, there have been a bunch of bug fixes and enhancements that
> have been done compared to the 2.2.4 release. Over 90 JIRA issues
> are resolved for 2.2.5
>
>
> List of issues:
>
> The Maven staging area is a
+1
David
2009/10/8 Daniel Kulp
>
> This is a vote to release CXF 2.1.7
>
> Once again, there have been a bunch of bug fixes and enhancements that
> have been done compared to the 2.1.6 release. Over 25 JIRA issues
> are resolved for 2.1.7
>
>
> List of issues:
>
> The Maven staging area is at
+1
David
2009/10/8 Daniel Kulp
>
> This is a vote to release CXF 2.2.4
>
> Once again, there have been a bunch of bug fixes and enhancements that
> have been done compared to the 2.2.3 release. Over 59 JIRA issues
> are resolved for 2.2.4.
>
>
> List of issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jir
Hi all,
The CXF DOSGi builds have started failing this morning with the
message below. Previously they were building fine. Does anyone know
what happened to the abera 0.4.0-incubating dependencies which come in
via the cxf-minimal bundle?
See: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/view/CXF/job/CXF
+1
David
2009/5/22 Daniel Kulp :
>
> This is a vote to release CXF 2.2.2
>
> With only 23 JIRA's resolved for 2.2.2, this doesn't have as many "fixes" as
> many of the previous patch releases. HOWEVER, there is a one major new
> feature: the JAX-RS 1.0 TCK now passes. Thus, it's worth a rel
+1
David
2009/5/7 Eoghan Glynn :
> Folks,
>
> I'm calling a second vote to release CXF Distributed OSGi 1.0.
>
> The main differences between this and the first take are:
>
> - addition of a sources distro
> - LICENSE file now contains references to licenses for 3rd party dependencies
> - remo
+1
David
2009/5/1 Eoghan Glynn :
> Folks,
>
> I'm calling a vote to release CXF Distributed OSGi 1.0.
>
> The dOSGi subproject of CXF provides the Reference Implementation of
> the Distribution Software (DSW) component of the Distributed OSGi
> Specification[1].
>
> The staging area can be found
+1
David
2009/4/21 Daniel Kulp :
> This is a vote to release CXF 2.0.11
>
> Once again, there have been a bunch of bug fixes and enhancements that
> have been done compared to the 2.0.10 release. Over 36 JIRA issues
> are resolved for 2.0.11.
>
> List of issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira
+1
David
2009/4/21 Daniel Kulp :
> This is a vote to release CXF 2.1.5
>
>
> Once again, there have been a bunch of bug fixes and enhancements that
> have been done compared to the 2.1.4 release. Over 87 JIRA issues
> are resolved for 2.1.5.
>
> List of issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/
Hi all,
I've been doing some work regarding CXF-1966, removing the Equinox
jars and moving the system tests to use Felix 1.4.1. It now works with
Spring 1.2.0-rc2-SNAPSHOT.
As Eoghan says, there is still the missing functionality around the
versions in the ServicePublication. The impact here is t
Great to hear about the JAXRS component for DOSGi, Sergey!
What is the expected release timeframe of CXF 2.2.1?
If its a bit further out, why not do a DOSGi 1.0 release based on CXF
2.2 and then do another 1.1 release with the JAXRS stuff as soon as
2.2.1 is out?
Cheers,
David
2009/3/26 Sergey
Hi all,
Since CXF 2.2 is out now I was thinking about what work needs to be
done for a DOSGi 1.0 release.
I've just updated the poms to depend on CXF 2.2, but there's still a
few things to do...
* there is CXF-1966. It would be good to get a solution to this. I
heard that Spring-DM 1.2.0 is goin
+1
David Bosschaert
+1
David Bosschaert
2009/2/16 Sergey Beryozkin :
> As you all know we've been looking for people to help us with our JAXRS
> project for a while. We've had some great feedback
>
> and a number of patches submitted from our JAXRS users which helped us
> tremendously. Andrzej Michalec (Andy) has be
+1
David Bosschaert
+1
David Bosschaert
+1
David Bosschaert
2009/2/3 Daniel Kulp :
>
> Since it's been about 4 months since the 2.0.9 release, I decided to go ahead
> and do a 2.0.10 release along with 2.1.4.
>
> This is a vote to release CXF 2.0.10
>
> Once again, there have been a bunch of bug fixes and enhancements that
> have been
+1
David Bosschaert
2009/2/3 Daniel Kulp :
> This is a vote to release CXF 2.1.4
>
> With a longer than normal cycle, a LOT of stuff is in this. Over 88 JIRA
> issues are resolved for 2.1.3 which is quite a bit of work.
>
> List of issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jsp
Hi all,
The Distributed OSGi implementation in Apache CXF has graduated out of
the sandbox to its new location as a CXF subproject:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cxf/dosgi/trunk
As a subproject it will have an independent release schedule to the
main CXF code base.
The current implementation pr
Hi all,
Currently all of the bugs against the Distributed OSGi code are filed
in the 'OSGi' component in CXF. However I think this is potentially
confusing as the 'OSGi' component really hints to me that it relates
to OSGi properties of core CXF (e.g. the way OSGi metadata is added to
OSGi-bundeli
33 matches
Mail list logo
