Re: Internal server error

2009-06-30 Thread Andrew Clegg
Whoops, sorry about previous reply-all, this thread shouldn't be here. 2009/6/30 Andrew Clegg : > 2009/6/30 Naresh Tallapelli : > >> More information about this error may be available >> in the server error log. > > Are you writing the server, the client or both? Have

Re: Internal server error

2009-06-30 Thread Andrew Clegg
2009/6/30 Naresh Tallapelli : > More information about this error may be available > in the server error log. Are you writing the server, the client or both? Have you looked in the server's error log (or asked the server admin to do so)? There's no way to help without seeing the details of the e

Re: HTTP transport -- no exception on server side when client has reset TCP connection

2009-06-25 Thread Andrew Clegg
re in order to reproduce it. Possibly do-able with a debugger -- dig down to find the Socket object and call setLinger() and close() on it -- hard to say if it's a realistic reproduction though :-( Andrew. 2009/6/25 Andrew Clegg : > 2009/6/24 Daniel Kulp : > >> Any chance you could

Re: HTTP transport -- no exception on server side when client has reset TCP connection

2009-06-25 Thread Andrew Clegg
2009/6/24 Daniel Kulp : > Any chance you could try with Jetty?  Maybe Jetty does something different. Sure, I'll need to install a few things on the server first -- I'll set it up today hopefully and let you know what happens. Andrew. -- :: http://biotext.org.uk/ ::

Re: HTTP transport -- no exception on server side when client has reset TCP connection

2009-06-24 Thread Andrew Clegg
PS I should have mentioned: JDK 1.6.0_06-b02, Tomcat/6.0.16, Centos 5.3, CXF 2.2.2 -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/HTTP-transportno-exception-on-server-side-when-client-has-reset-TCP-connection-tp24182294p24183358.html Sent from the cxf-dev mailing list archive at Nab

HTTP transport -- no exception on server side when client has reset TCP connection

2009-06-24 Thread Andrew Clegg
I'm posting this here rather than on the users list as it's a bit technical, and I suspect it might indicate a bug in either CXF or at a lower level. However, I'm really not sure how to simulate it in a way that would make a convenient JIRA entry. I'm happy to bundle up some example code, if some

Re: Proposal -- removing irrelevent services from WSDL

2008-11-07 Thread Andrew Clegg
ostnames for it, but rather URI's that >>> represent the logical purpose of the operation. >>> >>> The soap:address is obviously used to connect to the service, hence it >>> must be updated. >>> >>> >>> >>>> -Origi

RE: Proposal -- removing irrelevent services from WSDL

2008-11-06 Thread Andrew Clegg
t > represent the logical purpose of the operation. > > The soap:address is obviously used to connect to the service, hence it > must be updated. > > > >> -Original Message- >> From: Andrew Clegg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sent: Thursday, Novemb

Proposal -- removing irrelevent services from WSDL

2008-11-06 Thread Andrew Clegg
Hey folks, I have a WSDL-first project which contains several service definitions, each with a separate binding to a separate port type. When I go to the 'services' page for the WAR in Tomcat, I get a bunch of links like: http://myserver:8080/MyWar/services/ServiceOne?wsdl http://myserver:8080